SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
V.R. KRISHNA IYER, O. CHINNAPPA REDDY AND A.P. SEN, JJ.
Mahindra Nath Shukla and others etc., Petitioners
Versus
State of Bihar and others etc. etc., Respondents.
Writ Petns. Nos. 112-115, 175, 297, 194-198, 489-490, 213, 2-3 and 432 of 1980; 1477, 1516 and 1517 of 1979 and Spl. Leave Petn. (Civil) No. 2746 of 1980
Decided on11-4-1980.*
AND
Jugal Kishore Jayaswal, Petitioner
Versus
Pradit Gupta and another, Respondents.
Advocates appeared
Mr. Lal Narain Sinha, Attorney General (in W. Ps. Nos. 1477 of 1979, 112-115, 194 and 199 of 1980) (Mr. U. P. Singh, Advocate with him), for Respondents (State of Bihar & Its Officials) in W.Ps. Nos. 112-115 of 1980, 1477 of 1979, 175, 213, 2-3, 459, 489-90 of 1980 and S.P.L. No. 2746 of 1980. 1309
Mr. M. K. Banerjee, Addl. Solicitor General (M/s. S. B. Sinha and D. P. Mukherjee, Advocates with him) (for No. 9 in W.Ps. Nos. 112-115 of 1980) and Mr. Rathin Das, Advocate, for Respondents (State of W.B. in W.Ps. Nos. 1516-1517 of 1979).
Mr. S. Jauhar, Advocate, for the Interveners in W.P. No. 175 of 1980.
* From judgment and decree in A.F.O. No. Nil of 1980, D/- 11-2-1980 (Cal).
Coking Coal Mines (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1971 - Section 3 - Incorporating Total Interdict Of Mining Applied - Elation To Coal Mines And Not In Relation To Coking Coal Mines - Separate Provisions Separately Inserted - Light of history of package of nationalisation legislations existence of two sets of legislation legislative history was relevant to interpretation of S. 3 (3) of 1976 Act - In his submission amendment brought about incorporating total interdict of mining applied only in relation to coal mines and not in relation to coking coal mines - For this argument he sought sustenance from existence of two sets of legislation dealing with coal mines and coking coal mines - He further pointed out that even as late when amendments were contemplated in regard to coal mines and coking coal mines nationalisation there were separate provisions separately inserted in both nationalisation measures - He cited Act as illustrative even decisive - Absence of any mention of coking coal mines in Act was in his submission conclusive of parliamentary intent in his favour especially when read in light of history of package of nationalisation legislations – Held, It has been mentioned on more than one occasion in this Court that interlocutory orders have been sought and obtained that Receivers have been appointed by other Courts and that they have been working these mines - In face of statutory prohibition which is imperative in tone and all embracing in language even punishable for violation it is surprising that any Receiver could at all dare to work mines without running a grave risk - Court cannot sanction commission of a crime - Court make it perfectly plain that there will be no more authorisation for any Receiver or other officer of court to extract coal or coking coal from any mine in India - Petitions Dismissed.
JUDGMENT
KRISHNA IYER, J.:— We have a hunch - we leave it at that - that these "workers" writ petitions are a kind of litigative puppetry, the illcit mine exploiters being the puppeteers. This set of writ petitions, where some private managements claim to have the right to extract coking coal on the score that prohibition enacted in the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Amendment Act, 1976 does not affect or operate on coking coal mines, must be dismissed as devoid deserts.
2. The short point sharply focussed by Dr. Chitale and echoed with some variant notes by other counsel, in support of those writ petitions may be briefly stated thus. According to him, the history of coal nationalisation legislation in this country in the seventies of this century shows that Parliament has treated coal and coking coal separately for legislative purposes in regard to taking over of management, nationalisation of ownership and the like. It all began with the year 1971 when Parliament enacted the Coking Coal Mines (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1971 (hereinafter called the 1971 Act for short). It took over management of coking coal mines. Iron and Steel are key industries requiring, importantly, coking coal for their very survival. When Parliament found that coking coal was not being made available properly to the Industry on account of the unsatisfactory conduct of the Private sector operating in this field, the entire management of coking coal mines was taken over on an emergency footing in the public interest by the 1971 Act. Thereafter, with more deliberation and detailed investigation, the management of coking coal mines (and of other coal mines) was taken over by appropriate legislation, still later, after mature planning and understanding of implications. Parliament enacted legislation for vesting of ownership of coking coal mines and eventually of all coal mines. The management of coking coal was taken over by the Central Government under Coking Coal Mines (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1971. The management of all other coal mines was taken over by the Central Government under the Coal Mines (Taking over of Management) Act, 1973. The second step after management came under the control of the Central Government was the actual nationalisation of ownership itself. This state of planning led to Parliamentary enactments of Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 (36 of 1972) and the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 (26 of 1973). The sequence of events shows the evolution of national policy in this regard. Coking coal, being absolutely essential, was first taken over urgently. Later on, the entire coal industry came under Parliamentary consideration and management thereof was taken over. Finally, the ownership of all coal mines, including coking coal mines, was vested in the Central Government and in certain instrumentalities created by Central Government. Thus we see that the comprehensive plan behind coal nationalisation did not permit of private agencies operating in the field. Coking coal was more strategic than ordinary coal having regard to its use for iron and steel industries. Nevertheless, it was found as a fact that on account of these mines being located in remote places and in jungles, especially in the State of Bihar and Bengal, the Central Government wanted to take effective steps to put an end to clandestine mining by any private agency. The jungle of laws haphazardly enacted partly helped the privateers get round the law and clandestinely or even through Court receivers extract coal as there was big money in it. Therefore, the 1976 Act was enacted to plug all loop-holes, virtually banish the private sector and to ensure legal success for Project Public Sector in the field of coal mining. Section 3 (3) of the 1976 Act reads thus :
"3 (3). On and from the commencement of Section 3 of the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Amendment Act, 1976 :-
(a) no person, other than -
(i) the Central Government or a Government company or a corporat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.