SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 231

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
O. CHINNAPPA REDDY AND A.P. SEN, JJ.
Rajamallaiah and another, Appellants
Versus
Anil Kishore and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 3429-3432 and 3427-28 of 1979
Decided on 25-4-1980.
AND
State of A.P. and others etc., Appellants
Versus
Anil Kishore and others etc., Respondents.
Advocates appeared
Mr. V. M. Tarkunde, Sr. Advocate (M/s. P. N. Ramalingam and A. T. M. Sampath, Advocates with him), for Appellants in C. A. Nos. 3429-3432 of 1979.
Mr. K. K. Venugopal, Sr. Advocate (in C. As. Nos. 3427-3428) (Mr. B. Parthasarthy, Advocate with him), for Appellants in C. A. Nos. 3427-3428 of 1979 and for the State in C. A. Nos. 3429-3432 of 1979.
Mr. S. N. Kacker, Sr. Advocate (in 3427), Mr. P. R. Mridul, Sr. Advocate (in 3429) (M/s. R. Satish, V. K. Pandita and E. C. Agarwal, Advocates with them), for Respondents 1, 3, 4 and 7 in C. A. Nos. 3427-3432 of 1979.
* Writ Appeals Nos. 367, 368, 397 and 398 of 1979 respectively, D/- 22-11-1979 (Andh Pra).

Advocates:
A.T.M.SAMPATH, B.PARTHASARTHY, E.C.AGARWAL, K.K.VENUGOPAL, P.M.RAMALINGAM, P.R.MRIDUL, R.SATISH, S.N.KACKAR, V.K.PANDITA, V.M.TARKUNDE

Headnote:

Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 - Section 17, 72, 29, 31 and 64 - Andhra Pradesh Excise (Lease of Right to Sell Liquor in Retail) Rules, 1969 Rule 4 - Proposal To Hold An Auction Bidders Walked Out - Shops To Auction As A Single Lot - Individually Fetched Bids Aggregating Action Of Collector Was Contrary - Persons who were lessees of arrack shops in twin cities during filed two Writ Petitions in High court questioning auction held on ground that Collector had no jurisdiction to auction shops as one lot thereby altering entire pattern of auction as notified earlier - It was pleaded that action of Collector was contrary to R. 12 of Andhra Pradesh Excise (Lease of Right to Sell Liquor in Retail) Rules, 1969 and administrative instructions issued by Excise Commissioner by which Collector was bound – Held, Court also notice that allegation of respondents that they were given but half an hours time to prepare for auction of shops as a single group was not controverted - Having regard to fact that rules required large deposits to be made it is impossible to hold that half an hours time could be considered sufficient by any stretch of imagination - Court have already recorded undertaking given by respondents that they would give security amount within one week and that they would start bids at reauction in such a way that aggregate of bids - Appeals Dismissed.

JUDGMENT

O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.:— Apparently there is big money in the liquor business. When, at the close of the hearing on Friday 18th April, 1980, we asked M/s. Kacker and Mridul whether their clients were prepared to deposit or furnish security in a sum of Rs. 35 lakhs in order to guarantee that the bids at a re-auction, if so ordered, would so start that their aggregate would be not less than Rs. 35 lakhs, they agreed with alacrity. We asked the question as we wanted to satisfy ourselves about their bona fides. On a request made on April 20, 1980, we have given them a weeks time to give security to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Excise, Hyderabad.

2. On August 20, 1979, a notification was published in the District Gazette, Hyderabad, by the Commissioner of Excise, Andhra Pradesh, giving notice of a proposal to hold an auction, from September 1, 1979 to Sept. 3, 1979, of the right to sell arrack in retail in respect of 78 arrack shops in the twin cities of Hyderabad and Secunderabad during the Abkari year, October 1, 1979 to Sept. 30, 1980. The notification was published under R. 4 of the Andhra Pradesh Excise (Lease of Right to Sell Liquor in Retail) Rules, 1969, made in exercise of the powers conferred upon the Government by S. 72 read with Ss. 17, 29, 31 and 64 of the Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968. The notification mentioned that 22 out of the 78 shops would be auctioned in ten groups of two and three shops, while the remaining 56 shops would be auctioned individually. This was according to the pattern which obtained for the year 1978-79 for which year the auction fetched, an aggregated monthly rental of Rs. 32,99,537.72 ps. On account of some representations made by excise contractors in regard to some conditions regarding the bottling of arrack, the auction was postponed to September 7, 1979. The first auction was held on September 7, 1979, when no bids were received for the arrack shops. A second auction was held on Sept. 12, 1979 and again there were no bids. On Sept. 19, 1979, no auction could be held as all the bidders walked out. On September 21, 1979, the Collector (the auctioning authority) followed a peculiar procedure. First he auctioned 34 arrack shops in Hyderabad city individually and the bids fetched an aggregate of Rupees 6, 49, 700 (monthly rental). Then he put the 34 shops to auction as a single lot but there was no bid. Similarly he auctioned the arrak shops of Secunderabad city individually and they fetched an aggregate bid of Rs. 6,02,2100 (monthly rental). He then put the 44 shops to auction as a single lot but there was no bid. Thereafter he put the entire lot of 78 arrack shops to auction as a single lot. There was no bid. There was a tender but the tender had to be rejected as the tenderer was not present in the auction hall even after an announcement was made on the microphone and the auctioning authority waited for a considerable time. The auction was then postponed to Sept. 22, 1979 and on that day, the same peculiar procedure was repeated. The 34 shops of Hyderabad city when auctioned individually fetched bids aggregating to Rs. 6,75,000. There were also tenders. The aggregate of the highest bid or tender for the different shops came of Rs. 7,70,060/55 ps. The 44 shops in Secunderabad city were then auctioned individually. The aggregate of the bids came to Rs. 8,30,000. There were tenders also. The aggregate of the highest bid or tender for the different shops came to Rs. 10,82,885,27. Thereafter 34 shops of Hyderabad city were auctioned as one lot and there was a bid for Rupees 8,00,000 and a tender for Rupees 10,55,229. Similarly the 44 shops in Secunderabad city were auctioned as one lot and the maximum bid was Rupees 13,50,000 while two tenders were received, the highest of which was Rs. 14,11,111. The Collector then auctioned all the 78 shops as one lot. The highest bid was Rs. 24,00,000 while there were two tenders for Rs. 15,11,111/11 and Rupees 25,55,555/55. The tender for

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top