SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(SC) 387

P.N.SHINGHAL, V.R.KRISHNA IYER
Sushil Chowdhary – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
B.P.SINGH, L.R.SINGH, S.N.JHA, Udaipratap Singh

JUDGMENT

KRISHNA IYER, J.:— Leave granted confined to Appellants Munni Marandi and Babua Marandi, Leave refused so far as others are concerned.

2. We have heard the arguments of appellants counsel with specific reference to Munni Marandi and Babua Marandi. We have also read through the evidence relating to these accused persons aided by counsel for the State. The role attributed to Munni Marandi is that he was a member of the crowd which chased the deceased and in that sense was liable under S. 149 read with S. 326 I. P. C. We cannot fault the High Court for the conviction rendered, but having due regard to the age of the accused and to the absence of any overt act on his part, we consider that a sentence of two years R. I. will, in the circumstances of this case, meet the ends of justice.

3. Babua Marandi, a boy aged 15, was also in the crowd. In the excited chase of the deceased, this boy also followed and when the actual sword thrust was made by Ranjit Chaudhry, this boy held the deceased. In this sense, his part is different from that of Munni Marandi. We are not, therefore, disposed to interfere with his conviction or the sentence. Nevertheless, it is important to remember that


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top