SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 263

P.S.KAILASAM, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Ata Mohd – Respondent


Advocates:
G.N.DIKSHIT, RANI CHHABRA, S.K.Bagga, S.Markandaya, YOGESHAR PRASAD

JUDGMENT

KAILASAM, J.:— This appeal is preferred by the State of Uttar Pradesh by Certificate granted by the High Court of judicature at Allahabad on 18-5-1980 (?) in SC Appeal No. 105 of 1966 against its judgment and decree dated 25th August, 1965 passed by it in first appeal No. 27 1951, dismissing the suit filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh.

2. The State of Uttar Pradesh filed suit No. 109 of 1949 in the Court of Civil Judge, Gorakhpur against the respondent Ata Mohd. for a mandatory injunction directing the respondent to remove his material and construction and to clear the land and the plot No. 227 in Mohalla Purdilpur in the City of Gorakhpur and for a decree for possession over the land measuring 45 x 20. The Civil Judge, Gorakhpur dismissed the suit by judgment and decree dated 3-10-1950. The plaintiff preferred first appeal No. 27 of 1951 to the High Court of Allahabad. The appeal was heard by a Bench of two Judges but on a difference of opinion, the matter was referred to the third Judge. In accordance with the view of the majority, the appeal preferred by the plaintiff, was dismissed by its judgment dated 25th August, 1965. On a certificate granted by the High Court und




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top