SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 446

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.S. SARKARIA AND O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, JJ.
Public Prosecutor, Govt. of A.P., Appellant
Versus
Boya Jaggapuram Venkateswarlu and others. Respondents.
Criminal Appeal No. 181 of 1972
Decided on 6-10-1980.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 302 read with 149 - Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 164 - Offence of murder – Unlawful Assembly - Appeal by special leave - Appeal against judgment - Deceased , his sons, other two deceased, and his wife (P. W. 1) went to their filed called in revenue estate of village - Started running a Guntaka pulled by bullocks, while sons engaged themselves in putting mud on bunds - P. W. 1 was collecting uprooted studs in a basket - In afternoon, P. W. 1 with a basket full of uprooted stubs started to go home - When she had gone a short distance, she saw A-1 to A-3, armed with Yerika Sickles, coming from direction of village - Sensing danger she threw the basket and ran back towards filed where her sons were working, shouting that their father would be killed - At same time, A-4 to A-8 and two other strangers also armed with sickels and battle axes approached deceased persons - All these 10 persons converged on Peddiah and started assaulting him with their weapons - Assailants killed at spot in no time and then immediately rushed towards sonsand attacked them. P. W. 1 in an attempt to save her eldest son, approached assailants with her hands raised, entreating them to spare her son – Held, assailants might have thought it unchivalrous to murder old unarmed woman - Their design, it appears, was to kill head of family and his sons only - There is no foundation in evidence for argument that avowed object of assailants was to wipe off the entire family- They did not proclaim or utter any words indicating such an intention - Court are of opinion that arguments employed and reasons given by High Court for rejecting evidence of P. W. 1 and P. W. 3, in particular and prosecution case in general, were not sound, and did not justify reversal of view of evidence taken by trial court and consequent acquittal of accused persons – Court allow State appeal, set aside acquittal of accused respondents 3, 5, 7 and 8 and convict them under Section 302 read with Section 149 I. P. C. on three counts for murders deceased persons and sentence each of them on each of counts to imprisonment for life, with a direction that sentences shall run concurrently - Appeal allowed.

JUDGMENT

SARKARIA, J.:— This appeal by special leave is directed against a judgment, dated September 29, 1971 of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Eight persons who will hereinafter be referred to as A-1 to A-8, were put on trial for the murder of Peddiah alias Dubbanna and his two sons, Chinna Pullana and Pedda Pullanna.

2. About 2 years before these murders (Sugreevudu) one of the sons of A-1 was murdered at the toddy shop of P. W. 4, Mukkidi Naganna was prosecuted under Section 302, Indian Penal Code for that murder, Venkataramudu, the grand-son of P. W. 4, herein, was a prosecution witness in that case. Peddiah alias Dubbanna deceased in the present case was looking after the defence of Mukkidi Naganna and as a result of his influence one prosecution witness in that case turned hostile. Since the murder of Sugreevudu, A-1 had been living in village Divamdinne. On account of this the present accused were nursing a grudge against the deceased.

3. On July 22, 1970 at about 2.30 p. m., the deceased Peddiah alias Dubbanna, his sons, the other two deceased, and his wife (P. W. 1) went to their filed called Cheruvu Chenu in the revenue estate of village Kanakaveedu. Peddiah started running a Guntaka pulled by bullocks, while the sons engaged themselves in putting mud on the bunds. P. W. 1 was collecting the uprooted studs in a basket. In the afternoon, P. W. 1 with a basket full of the uprooted stubs started to go home. When she had gone a short distance, she saw A-1 to A-3, armed with Yerika Sickles, coming from the direction of Kanakaveedu village. Sensing danger she threw the basket and ran back towards the filed where her sons were working, shouting that their father would be killed. At the same time, A-4 to A-8 and two other strangers also armed with sickels and battle axes approached the deceased persons. All these 10 persons converged on Peddiah and started assaulting him with their weapons. The assailants killed Peddiah alias Dubbanna at the spot in no time and then immediately rushed towards the sons, Chinna Pullanna and Pedda Pullanna, and attacked them. P. W. 1 in an attempt to save her eldest son, approached the assailants with her hands raised, entreating them to spare her son. But A-4 struck P. W. 1 with the sickle causing an injury on her left palm and also hit her with the handle portion of the sickle on the left arm. All the accused gave an indiscriminate beating to the two sons and killed them at the spot. P. W. 2, Boya Jaggapuram Hanumanna and Venkataramudu also witnessed the occurrence. P. W. 1 then rushed to the village while the assailants were still active on the scene. On reaching the village she informed P. W. 3 about the occurrence when the latter asked her as to how she had sustained the bleeding injury on her left hand. P. W. 3 is the wife of one Narasimuhulu who was the nephew of deceased, Dubbanna. Narasimhulu was away from his house at that time. Shortly thereafter, all the assailants, including A-1 to A-8, similarly armed came to the house of Narasimhulu, brandishing their bloodstained weapons, and enquired from P. W. 3 in abusive language regarding the whereabouts of her husband. The accused proclaimed that they had done away with three persons in the filed, and they had come to do away with Narasimhulu, also. P. W. 3 replied that she did not know the whereabouts of her husband. The accused then similarly armed proceeded to the house of P. W. 4, who was then sitting on the pial of his house. They enquired of him about his sons, proclaiming that they had just exterminated Dubbanna and his two sons and would finish his sons, also P. W. 4 told them that his sons were not at his house. After abusing P. W. 4 filthily the accused went away towards the house of Eramma, P. W. 5, and enquired regarding the whereabouts of her husband. She told them that her husband had gone away to another village. The assailants them went away shouting that he had escaped death.

4. Shortly after the departure of the assailant































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top