SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 269

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.C. GUPTA, S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI AND P.S. KAILASAM, JJ.
Miss Nishi Maghu etc. etc., Petitioners
Versus
State of J. and K. and others, Respondents.
Writ Petns. Nos. 1488-89, 1556-57 and 1571 of 1979, 29, 201, 222, 249, 260-63, 267, 268-271, 278, 279, 304, 305, 309, 310 and 326 of 1980
Decided on 9-5-1980.

Advocates:
A.T.M.SAMPATH, Altaf Ahmed, ANIL DEV SINGH, C.S.S.RAO, DVARKA NATH GUPTA, E.C.AGARWAL, K.SENENEN, L.K.PANDEY, L.M.SINGHVI, LALIT GUPTA, Mukul Mudgal, NAUNIT LAL, P.N.Ramalingam, R.SATISH, S.K.SABHARWAL, S.N.KACKAR, S.P.GUPTA, S.S.JAUHAR, V.K.PANDITA, Y.S.Chitale

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Article 14 and 32 - Admission - Applications - M. B. B. S. course - Challenged - Selection of candidates admitted to Government Medical College, for academic year is challenged in these petitions under Article 32 of Constitution by some of candidates who were not selected - By notification published Government Gazette on applications were invited for admission to M. B. B. S. course in aforesaid college - Only those candidates who had passed Pre-Medical or Inter-Science or First Year T. D. C. (Medical Group) examination from University of Jammu or any other equivalent examination and had secured not less than 50 per cent marks in science subjects in aggregate (theory and practical) were eligible to apply for admission; however, for scheduled castes, scheduled tribes, and candidates and candidates from district and Bad pockets qualifying marks was 45 per cent - It was further provided that selection would be made in accordance with manner and procedure laid down in various orders issued by Government from time to time – Held, It was contended that in view of these conditions Kulbhushan Gupta was not eligible for selection though no objection was raised when he appeared for interview - Clearly therefore bar in clause 17 or clause 18 cannot apply to his case, and it must be held that he was improperly refused admission to Government Medical College is entitled on merit to a seat in College - Court are conscious that revision of list of selected candidates at this stage will not only cause hardship to students who will be exclude but some of those who might get into list are also likely to experience certain difficulties – Court are also conscious that late revision of list will create problems for authorities but that, Court are afraid, cannot be helped – Court hope authorities will deal sympathetically with cases where it may be possible for them to render some help to students in this situation and relax rigour of rules to utmost permissible extent for purpose - Order accordingly.

JUDGMENT

GUPTA, J.:— The selection of candidates admitted to the Government Medical College, Jammu, for the academic year 1979-80 is challenged in these petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution by some of the candidates who were not selected. By notification published in the Jammu and Kashmir Government Gazette on June 21, 1979 applications were invited for admission to the M. B. B. S. course in the aforesaid college. Only those candidates who had passed the Pre-Medical or Inter-Science or First Year T. D. C. (Medical Group) examination from the University of Jammu or any other equivalent examination and had secured not less than 50 per cent marks in science subjects in aggregate (theory and practical) were eligible to apply for admission; however, for scheduled castes, scheduled tribes, Bakarwal and Gujjar candidates and candidates from Ladakh district and Bad pockets the qualifying marks was 45 per cent. Candidates who had been selected or nominated by the Government of Jammu and Kashmir or had been already selected by a selection committee constituted by the Government for any training course in or outside the State were not eligible to apply or to appear for interview for admission to this college. The notification added: "Comparative merit of the candidates will be adjudged with respect to physical fitness, aptitude, personality, general knowledge and general intelligence in the interview, for which marks will be awarded according to the performance of the candidates". It was further provided that the selection would be made in accordance with the manner and procedure laid down in the various orders issued by the Government from time to time. The total number of seats filled by selection in this college for the year 1979-80 was 52. The candidates numbered 526, out of which 473 actually appeared for interview. In addition 10 seats were filled by candidates nominated by the Government. It appears from the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the State of Jammu and Kashmir that the nominations had to be made only from two sources: wards of non-resident Defence personnel, and students from other States.

2. Before we proceed to consider the grounds on which the selection is challenged, it will be necessary to refer to the contents of the orders issued by the Government of Jammu and Kashmir to regulate the selection. The earliest order which is relevant in this context was made on July 9, 1973. This concerns admission to technical institutions which include medical colleges. The order starts by saying that "the man power requirements of various parts of the State have not received uniform and equal treatment with the result that there has been imbalance in the development of human resources in these parts", and "since the admission to technical institutions also lead to the development of human resources", it had therefore "became necessary to provide equal opportunities to the permanent resident candidates of all parts of the State and all sections of society". The order then lays down the following rules for admission until further orders, it is said, with the aforesaid object in view:

(1) 50 per cent of the seats "should be straightway earmarked for being filled upon the basis of open merit in accordance with the criteria to be adopted by the concerned selection committee constituted by the Government in this behalf".

(2) Of the remaining seats, 25 per cent is reserved for candidates falling under the categories specified below to the extent indicated against each, to be 1977 filled on the basis of merit in each category:

(a) Scheduled castes. 8

(b) Children of freedom fighters 7

(c) Children of permanent resident Defence personnel. 3

(d) Candidates belonging to the following socially and educationally backward classes as recommended by the Backward Class Committee:

(i) Areas adjoining actual line of control. 3

(ii) Areas known as bad pockets including Ladakh. 3

(iii) Social castes. 1

It is further provided in




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top