A. D. KOSHAL, S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD
V. B. Raju – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT
KOSHAL, J.:— This appeal by certificate granted under Article 133 (1) (c) of the Constitution of India by the High Court of Gujarat is directed against its judgment dated 2-8-1973 and the sole point requiring decision therein is as to whether an order passed by the President of India under sub-section (1) of Section 29 of The Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and determining that the appellant shall on the 1st day of May 1960 cease to be Judge of the High Court of Bombay and become a Judge of the High Court of Gujarat is to be regarded as an order of transfer under Art. 222 (1) of the Constitution.
2. The appellant was appointed an Additional Judge of the High Court of Bombay on June 29, 1959. After the Act came into force the President of India passed the said order (hereinafter referred to as the impugned order) under Section 29 (1) of the Act in respect of the appellant, who was still an Additional Judge of the High Court of Bombay (and 4 other Judges of that Court) so that with effect from the 1st of May, 1960 the appellant became an Additional Judge of the High Court of Gujarat. Claiming that the impugned order amounts to an order of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.