SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 411

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
= 1980 Tax. L.R. 1789
(From : Asstt. Commr. (Judicial) Sales Tax, Meerut)*
15-9-1980.
P.N. BHAGWATI AND E.S. VENKATARAMIAH, JJ.
M/s. Anand Swarup Mahesh Kumar, Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Sales Tax, Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 3345 of 1979, D/- 15-9-1980.

Advocates:
P.H.Parekh, S.B.Singh, S.Markandaya, V.M.TARKUNDE

Headnote:(A) U.P. Sales Tax Act (15 of 1948), S.3D(1), S.3D(4) and S.3F - Goods notified under S. 3-D(1) - Levy of additional tax in respect of turnover of purchases thereof - S. 3-F overrides S. 3-D(4) - Demand of additional tax is valid.

       It is open to the assessing authority to demand additional tax under S. 3-F in respect of the turnover of purchases of goods notified under S. 3-D (1) of the Act. (Para 11)

       By enacting sub-section (4) of S. 3-D, the State Legislature has not forfeited its power to levy any other tax under the Act on the goods notified under S. 3-D (1) for ever. It is always open to the Legislature to modify the effect of sub-section (4) of Section 3-D by a subsequent legislation. (Para 11)

       Since S. 3-D of the Act is expressly mentioned in S. 3-F, it has to be held that S. 3-F overrides sub-s. (4) of S. 3-D and that additional tax can be collected even in respect of the turnover of purchases of goods notified under Section 3-D (1) notwithstanding sub.s. (4) of S. 3-D of the Act. (Para 11)

       (B) U.P. Sales Tax Act (15 of 1948), S.3D - Market fees payable to Commission Agent cannot be included in turnover of purchases.

       1979 Tax LR 1778(A11), Overruled.

       Judgment of Assistant Commissioner (Judicial) Sales Tax, Meerut in Appeal No. 1502 of 1978, D/- 31-7-1979, Reversed.

       The market fees payable under the U.P.Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, (25 of 1964) being a sum which can be collected from the purchaser by virtue of the provision contained in Section 17 (iii) (b) (1) of the Adhiniyam by the Commission Agent who is required to pay the same to the Market Committee, cannot be considered as forming part of the consideration paid or payable by the purchaser to the Commission Agent in respect of purchase of goods at an auction held within a market area established under the Adhiniyam and, therefore, it cannot be included in the turnover of purchases for purposes of levy of tax under Section 3-D of the Act. (Para 15)

       Where a dealer is authorised by law to pass on any tax payable by him on the transaction of sale to the purchaser, such tax does not form part of the consideration for purposes of levy of tax on sales or purchases but where there is no statutory provision authorising the dealer to pass on the tax to the purchaser, such tax does form part of the consideration when he includes it in the price and realizes the same from the purchaser. The essential factor which distinguishes the former class of cases from the latter class is the existence of a statutory provision authorising a dealer to recover the tax payable on the transaction of sale from the purchaser. 1979 Tax LR 1778 (A11), Overruled; AIR 1975 SC 1801, Rel. on; Judgment of Assistant Commissioner (Judicial) Sales Tax, Meerut in Appeal No. 1502 of 1978, D/- 31-7-1979, Reversed. (Para 15)

       (C) U.P. Sales Tax Act (15 of 1948), S.3D - Commission payable by purchaser to Commission Agent dealer - Can be included in turnover of purchases.

       The commission (dami) payable by a purchaser to a commission agent operating within a market area established 441 under the adhiniyam can be treated as forming part of the turnover of purchases for two reasons ( (i) the commission paid by the purchaser is not any tax or fee payable to a Government or statutory body which is not a party to the contract of sale and (ii) the commission is actually the profit of the dealer who also happens to be a commission agent and should, therefore, necessarily be considered as consideration for the sale of goods. (Para 16)

       The provisions contained in Section 10 of the Adhiniyam and the Rules framed thereunder do not in any way affect the above conclusion. A combined reading of Section 10 of the Adhiniyam , Rule 79 of the Rules made under the Adhiniyam and the bye-laws made by the Market Committee shows that a commission agent cannot realize any commission higher than what is prescribed by law. The commission chargeable by the commission agent is not a sum which he has in his turn to pay to an authority either by way of tax or by way of fee but is only a reward for the services rendered by him. (Para 17)

Judgment

VENKATARAMIAH, J.:- The appellant is a firm carrying on business at Mandi Anandganj, Barut, District Meerut in the State of Uttar Pradesh and is a dealer as defined in the U. P. Sales Tax Act. 1948 (Act No. XV of 1948) hereinafter referred to as the Act). It has filed this appeal by special leave under Article 136 of the Constitution against the order dated July 31, 1979 passed in Appeal No. 1502 of 1978 on the file of the Assistant Commissioner (judicial) Sales Tax, Meerut Range, Meerut upholding the inclusion of the market fee and the commission (otherwise called dami) payable to the commission agent operating within a market area established under the U. P., Krishi Utpadan mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 (U. P. Act No. XXV of 1964) (hereinafter referred to as the Adhiniyam) in the turnover of purchases of the appellant for purposes of levy of sales tax under S. 3-D of the Act. The assessment year in question is 1974-75. The appellant was granted leave to appeal to file the above appeal directly against the order of the Assistant Commissioner (judicial) since the question involved in this case had already been decided by the High Court of Allahabad in Durga Dass Narain Dass v. The State of Uttar Pradesh (Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 301 of 1978 and connected cases decided on December 18, 1978 (reported in 1979 Tax LR 1778) upholding the inclusion of the market fee and the commission (dami) in the purchase turnover for purposes of levy of sales tax.

2. It is necessary at the out-set to refer to some of the relevant provisions of law bearing on the questions involved in the case in order to appreciate the contentions urged on behalf of the appellant. There is no dispute that the appellant is a dealer as defined in Section 2 (e) of the Act and is a purchaser of goods notified under Section 3-D (1). Section 3-D of the Act provides that except as provided in sub-section (2) thereof, there shall be levied and paid for each assessment year or part thereof a tax on the turnover to be determined in the prescribed manner of purchases of such goods and with effect from such date as the State Government may by notification in the Gazette specify in relation to purchases made within Uttar Pradesh by a dealer (whether on his own account or on account of any one else) or through a dealer acting as a purchasing agent at the rate specified therein. Sub-section (4) of Section 3-D of the Act provides that on the issue of a notification under subsection (1) thereof, no tax shall be levied under any other section in respect of the goods included in the notification. The expression purchase price is defined in Section 2 (gg) of the Act as follows :

"2 (gg) purchase price means the amount of valuable consideration paid or payable by a person for the purchase of any goods, less any sum allowed by the seller as cash discount according to trade practice and shall include any sum charged for anything done by the seller in respect of the goods at the time of or before,delivery thereof, other than the cost of freight or delivery or the cost of installation when such cost is separately charged;"

3. The expression turnover of purchases is defined in Section 2 (ii) of the Act thus :

"2 (ii) turnover of purchases with its cognate expressions means the aggregate of the amounts of purchase price paid or payable by a dealer in respect of purchase of goods made by or through him after deducting the amount, if any, refunded to the dealer by the seller in respect of any goods returned to such seller within, such period as may be prescribed;"

4. Section 3-F of the Act which provides for the levy of additional tax on certain dealers was introduced into the Act by U. P. Act No. 3 of 1971. When it was so introduced it provided that every dealer liable to pay tax under Section 3, Section 3A, Section 3-AA or Section 3-D, whose total turnover of sales or of purchases, or of both in any assessment year exceeded rupees two lacs would, in addition to the said tax, be liable to p







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top