SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.S. SARKARIA AND O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, JJ.
State of J. and K., Appellant,
Versus
Hazara Singh and another, Respondents.
Criminal Appeals Nos. 151 of 1975 and 185 of 1976, D/- 24-9-1980.
AND
Hazara Singh, Appellant
Versus
State of J. and K., Respondent.
Ranbir Penal Code - Section 302/34 and 326 - Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 157 - Offence of Murder – Voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons – Charged - Public meeting in connection with elections to Legislative Assembly was held in compound of Co-operative Stores in village to canvass support for Congress candidate, who was pitched against an Independent candidate - Was Chairman of this meeting, while deceased, P. Ws. and attended this meeting - At about 6-30 P.M., when public gathering was being addressed by, respondent drove past place of meeting on a motorcycle on pillion of which was seated a non-Sikh gentleman - Deceased retorted that it was Government which had given him employment and appellant had done him no favour - On hearing this reply, exhorted to his brother, to let deceased have a taste of it - Thereupon, fired his gun hitting deceased in abdomen - One of pellets of same shot hit left hand of P. W. who was standing close to deceased - whether on basis of data available from post-mortem examination report, abdominal injuries were sufficient or likely to cause death – Held, probable that deceased or some of his companions pelted with a stone on head causing this injury - There after, it seems, brought out his licensed gun and fired a shot hitting deceased in abdomen - Even so, it cannot be said that gun shot was fired by Hazara Singh in exercise of his right of private defence - Gun shot fired , could not be said to be an act done in exercise of his right of private defence - It is not necessary to burden this Judgment with a detailed appraisal of evidence of prosecution witnesses - Suffice it to say here, that with exception of one aspect relating to simple injury on the head and latters version of circumstances in which he received it, Court entirely agree with the learned Judges of High Court that in spite of infirmities in evidence of eye-witnesses, substratum of their evidence as against could be safely accepted so as to find him guilty of an offence under Section 326, R.P.C. had been hit with a stone on head - He had thus received some provocation which can be taken into account for mitigation of sentence - Order accordingly.
Judgment
SARKARIA, J.:- The facts leading to these Criminal Appeals 151 of 1975 and 185 of 1976 are as follows :-
In the General Elections held to the Legislative Assembly of the State of Jammu and Kashmir in 1972, two candidates, namely, Rangil Singh (Congress) and Lala Sain Dass (Independent) contested from Ranbirsinghpura constituency. Two years earlier, in the election to the office of the Lambardar of Village Bahu, two factions came into existence. One of them was led by Pritam Singh, complainant, while the other was led by Piyara Singh and Hazara Singh, respondents in Criminal Appeal 151 of 1975. Pritam Singhs faction supported Sant Singh candidate, while Piyara Singhs faction canvassed for Gulab Singh, the rival candidate. The relations between Pritam Singh, complainant and his brother on one side and Piyara Singh and Hazara Singh on the other, which were already bitter became further strained due to this rivalry in the elections.
2. On February 28, 1972 in the evening, a public meeting in connection with the elections to the Legislative Assembly was held in the compound of the Co-operative Stores in village Bahu to canvass support for the Congress candidate, Rangil Singh, who was pitched against Lala Sain Dass, an Independent candidate. P. W. Pritam Singh was the Chairman of this meeting, while Rangil Singh, Janak Raj, M.L.C., Harbans Singh, deceased, P. Ws. Kapoor Singh, Nihal Singh, Amar Singh, Thakur Raj Singh and Suchet Singh attended this meeting. At about 6-30 P.M., when the public gathering was being addressed by Rangil Singh,Piyara Singh respondent drove past the place of meeting on a motorcycle on the pillion of which was seated a non-Sikh gentleman. The meeting terminated at about 7 p. m. At the conclusion of the meeting, tea was served to Rangil Singh, Janak Raj, Suchet Singh and other distinguished persons who had attended the meeting. Thereafter, Rangil Singh and Janak Raj departed for Jammu. The other persons, excepting Pritam Singh, complainant and his son Harbans Singh deceased, P. Ws. Kapoor Singh, Nihal Singh, Amar Singh and some others stayed behind to settle the tea accounts of the caterer, Gandhu Shah. On the way, when the complainant and his companions reached a culvert between the Havelies of Thakur Singh and the respondents at about 8 p. m., Hazara Singh was seen standing in the compound of his Haveli along with his brother, Piyara Singh, respondent. On seeing the complainant and his companions, Piyara Singh accosted Harbans Singh deceased that he had got the deceased employed as a teacher, yet he (deceased) was opposing him by participating in the meeting organized by the Congress Party. The deceased retorted that it was the Government which had given him the employment and the appellant had done him no favour. On hearing this reply, Piyara Singh exhorted to his brother, Hazara Singh to let the deceased have a taste of it. Thereupon, Hazara Singh fired his gun hitting the deceased in the abdomen. One of the pellets of the same shot hit the left hand of P. W. Kapoor Singh who was standing close to the deceased. At this juncture, Pritam Singh shouted to his companions to save themselves. Pritam Singh took shelter in a shop situate nearby. On receiving the injury, the deceased walked a few steps to take cover in the dilapidated Haveli of Thakur Singh, which was situate at a distance of 3 or 4 steps from him. He had hardly taken a step or two in that direction when Piyara Singh snatched the gun from Hazara Singh sarcastically remarking that the latter was even not able to kill the deceased. Piyara Singh then fired a shot at the deceased hitting him in the region of the eye and cheek. As a result of this gun-shot, the deceased dropped dead. Pritam Singh, complainant and his companions raised an alarm whereupon both the respondents, Piyara Singh and Hazara Singh got on their tractor and drove off. Piyara Singh was holding a gun and shouting at the top of his voice that whosoever would dare to approach t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.