SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 84

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI AND A. VARADARAJAN, JJ.
Union of India and others, Appellants
Versus
M.B. Patnaik and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 2119-2121 of 1979, and 389 of 1981, D/- 11-2-1981.
AND
Union of India and others, Appellants
Versus
P. N. L. Das, Respondent.

Headnote:

Employment and Service matter - Disciplinary proceeding – Misconduct - Removal from service - A departmental enquiry was initiated against these four respondents and three others, on basis of a report of Travelling Inspector of Accounts, and two charges were framed against them. second charge was not pressed, and we are concerned only with disciplinary proceeding relating to first charge, which led to removal of all seven persons from service-first charge framed against six persons - Third-class express tickets had been issued from Khurda Road to Howrah for total fare and these were accounted short on plea of over-issue of these tickets on. Record at Howrah Station indicated tickets were actually sold on 20-5-1959 and not on 12-5-1959. Result was fare amounting to Rs. 497.73 had been misappropriated on 20th December, 1959 by tampering with figure relating to 12-5-1959 in cash book – Held, Allegations on which charges are based are made known to railway servant and he is called upon to file his written statement after looking into all relevant records. Oral evidence of all witnesses tendered during enquiry is recorded in writing. Whereas here oral evidence is recorded in the presence of three persons constituting Inquiry Committee, any impression created by demeanor of a particular witness on mind of any one member cannot affect conclusion Disciplinary Authority has to consider record of inquiry and arrive at its own conclusion on each charge – Court direct the parties to bear their respective costs. Advocates fee Rupees 1,000/-, one set - Accept this offer as being beneficial to these three respondents in C. As. who will be entitled to recover from the Railway Administration on account of arrears of salary etc. payable to them from the date of their suspension –Appeal dismissed

Judgment

VARADARAJAN, J.:- These appeals by special leave have been filed against two judgments of a Division Bench of the Orissa High Court (C. A. No. 389 of 1981) arising out of the judgment in Original Jurisdiction Case No. 832 of 1977 and C. As. Nos. 2119-2121 of 1979 arising out of Original Jurisdiction Cases Nos. 1261 of 1976 and 833 and 834 of 1977 respectively. P. N. L. Das, the respondent in C. A. No. 389 of 1981 was appointed as a Booking Clerk in the South Eastern Railway in 1955, and had been duly confirmed at that post. M. B. Patnaik, the respondent in C. A. No. 2119 of 1979, was working as a confirmed Commercial Clerk at Khurda Road in the South Eastern Railway, having been appointed in January-February 1964. D. Sahu and S. C. Mitra, the respondents in C. As. Nos. 2020 and 2021 of 1979 respectively were working as confirmed Booking Clerks in the South Eastern Railway at about the same time. A departmental enquiry was initiated against these four respondents and three others, namely, Ch. N. Murty, B. S. N. Rao and B. Papa Rao in 1964 on the basis of a report of the Travelling Inspector of Accounts, and two charges were framed against them. The second charge was not pressed, and we are, therefore, concerned only with the disciplinary proceeding relating to the first charge, which led to the removal of all the seven persons from service. The first charge framed against these six persons was this :-

"On 20th May, 1959, 47 third-class express tickets had been issued from Khurda Road to Howrah for a total fare of Rs. 497.73 and these were accounted short on the plea of over-issue of these tickets on 12-5-1959. The record at Howrah Station indicated that the tickets were actually sold on 20-5-1959 and not on 12-5-1959. The result was the fare amounting to Rs. 497.73 had been misappropriated on 20th December, 1959 by tampering with the figure relating to 12-5-1959 in the cash book. The record foils of foreign express fare tickets issued on 12-5-1959 were fraudulently cancelled and the sum of Rs. 493.53 already accounted in the cash book against those two foreign express tickets was erased, and to balance the sum a fictitious sale of 47 tickets had been entered in the cash book."

2. Several points had been raised in the Writ Petition (Original Jurisdiction Case) No. 832 of 1977. But when that case was taken up the learned counsel for the petitioner P. N. L. Das confined his arguments only to two points, namely, (1) that though the Evidence Act does not strictly apply, suspicion and conjecture cannot form the basis of any conclusion in any departmental enquiry and (2) reasonable opportunity of defending himself had not been given to the petitioner P. N. L. Das. The disciplinary authority and punishing authority, namely, the General Manager, constituted an Enquiry Committee consisting of the Assistant Commercial Superintendent, Khurda Road and the Assistant Accounts Offices, Garden Reach, namely, Shri K. Julhe and Shri B. B. Chatterjee. In the midst of the enquiry Shri K. Julhe was transferred and thereafter his successor in office Shri B. K. Patnaik and Shri B. B Chatterjee, the Assistant Accounts Officers, Garden Reach continued the enquiry. The Enquiry Officers found the appellants in these appeals guilty of the charge. The punishing authority, the General Manager, on the representation of the respondents in C. As. Nos. 2119-2121 of 1979, directed a supplementary enquiry to be held. Notice of the supplementary enquiry was given in April 1967. At that time Shri B. K. Patnaik, who succeeded Shri K. Julhe as the Assistant Commercial Superintendent, Khurda Road as stated above, had been promoted as a Divisional Commercial Superintendent and was posted at Kharagpur while Shri B. B. Chatterjee, who was Assistant Accounts Officer, Garden Reach, had been promoted as the Divisional Accounts Officer and had been posted at Adra. These very persons issued the notice for continuing the enquiry after The General Manager directed the supp










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top