SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 110

BAHARUL ISLAM, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Charan Singh – Respondent


Judgment

O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.:- The respondent was convicted by the learned Special Judge, Ludhiana, of an offence under Sec. 5 (1) (d) read with Sec. 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay fine of rupees one hundred. On appeal, a learned single Judge of the High Court acquitted the respondent on the ground that there was non-compliance with the provisions of Rule 16.38 of the Punjab Police Rules, 1934. An application for the grant of a Certificate under Art. 134 (1) (c) of the Constitution was moved before the learned single Judge and was granted. The learned single Judge observed that when the case was argued before him, an earlier judgment of a Division Bench of the Punjab High Court in Hoshiar Singh v. The State, (1965) 67 Pun LR 438 at p. 442 was not brought to his notice and that had the decision been brought to his notice he would not have allowed the appeal merely on the ground that there was no compliance with Rule 16.38 of the Punjab Police Rules.

2. The learned single Judge of the High Court was clearly wrong in acquitting the respondent on the ground that there was non-compliance with t






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top