SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.D. KOSHAL, V.B. ERADI AND R.B. MISRA, JJ.
Badruddin Rukonddim Karpude and others, Appellants
Versus
State of Maharashtra, Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 372 of 1975, D/- 23-2-1981.
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 147,148,149,302 - SC (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970 - Section 2(j)(a) - Appeal Against Conviction - Challenge - Murder Case - Wife of one a resident of village quarrelled with his sister and he brought home deceased to pacify two ladies - Some time later the said and deceased went to latters house which is situated near flag-post in village chowk - At that time deceased was hurling abuses at ladies - Accused who was then present at a nearby hotel enquired from accused about person who was target of abuses and then instigated latter to beat deceased who had by then gone home - Accused went in company of each other to house of deceased and challenged him to come out - There was an exchange of hot words between them and deceased who emerged from his house in response to challenge - Then intervened and asked one to take away deceased - accompanied the deceased to house of one other 13 accused armed with sticks joined accused and then all of them reached the house of and demanded that door thereof be opened failing which they threatened to smash it - Not having been obliged by inmates they broke open the door dragged deceased out of house and took him to chowk where he was beaten by them with sticks - He fell to ground but beating was continued - who is wife of to the police of village namely while beating was in progress and told him that deceased was being belaboured by accused - Went to scene of occurrence found deceased lying injured and in a serious condition and asked him as to who had beaten him - Deceased responded with word "Karpude"A cot was arranged and the deceased was taken therein by and others to hospital at which lies at a distance of miles from villge and on way to which breathed his last - Party carrying dead body arrived at Police Station at. had already reached there - Held, Court find ourselves at one with learned counsel of appellants that implicit reliance cannot be placed on testmony of both of whom are not only deeply interested in deceased but have also been shown to have made during course of their testimony improvements in the prosecution story propounded by them at investigation stage and that in material particulars – Court need not give details of those improvements as they have been adverted to by learned trial Judge and it is conceded by learned counsel for the State that depositions of these two witnesses do suffer from that defect - In this view of matter Court propose to look for assuring circumstances for their testimony in case of each of appellants and to confirm conviction of only those of latter whose guilt as testified to by finds support from reliable evidence – Court have word of not only but also of other prosecution witnesses whose testimony does stand on a higher pedestal - Apart from that however Court have a wholly independent witness in person of police - He states that when he was contacted by and widow of deceased he was told by them that was being beaten in chowk by accused - Witness proceeds to say that on going to chowk he found lying seriously injured - In answer to a query from witness about identity of assailants deceased is said to have uttered a single word "Karpude" - Witness claims to have arranged for deceased to be taken to a hospital on way to which latter expired - This witness is not interested in either side and his word, therefore, deserves to be acted upon - His testimony shows unmistakably that accused Nos. 1. 3, 4 and 14 were named as the assailants of Amirali while the beating was still in progress - Information conveyed to witness is admissible as part of res gestae and in our opinion it lends very important corroboration to other evidence in support of culpability of 4 accused last mentioned - Ordered accordingly
Judgment
KOSHAL, J.:- This appeal under Section 2 (j) (a) of the SC (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970 is directed against a judgment dated the 11th July, 1975 of a Division Bench of the High Court of Bombay setting aside the acquittal recorded by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur of the 8 appellants and convicting them of offences under Sections 147 and 148 and Section. 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, and sentencing each of them to rigorous imprisonment for a year on the first count, to a similar term of imprisonment on the second, and to imprisonment for life on the third, the three sentences having been directed to run concurrently.
2. The occurrence took place on the 30th December, 1971 and Amirali, a step-brother of Shahabuddin (P. W. 1) lost his life in consequence. 17 persons were tried by the learned Additional Sessions Judge for the offences mentioned above as also one under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The trial ended in acquittal of all the accused with the judgment dated October 11, 1972 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge which was, however, set aside in the case of the 8 appellants by the High Court as stated above. The appellants were arraigned before the trial Court as accused Nos. 1, 3, 4, 7, 10, 14, 15 and 16 and that is how they would be referred to hereinafter in this judgment.
3. Some of the accused are inter-related and it may be helpful at this stage to set out how they are connected to each other. Accused No. 1 is a brother of accused No. 2 while accused Nos. 10, 11 and 12 are their nephews. Accused Nos. 8 and 9 are the cousins and accused No. 4 the maternal uncle of accused Nos. 1 and 2. All the 17 accused are residents of village Janval in Osmanabad District of the State of Maharashtra.
4. The prosecution case may briefly be stated thus. At about 8-00 a. m. on the 30th December, 1971 the wife of one Suleman, a resident of village Janval, quarrelled with his sister and he brought home the deceased to pacify the two ladies. Some time later the said Suleman and the deceased went to the latters house which is situated near the flag-post in the village chowk. At that time the deceased was hurling abuses at the ladies. Accused No. 3 (Sambha, who was then present at a nearby hotel) enquired from accused No. 1 (Badruddin) about the person who was the target of the abuses and then instigated the latter to beat the deceased who had by then gone home.
Accused Nos. 1, 3, 15 and 16 went in the company of each other to the house of the deceased and challenged him to come out. There was an exchange of hot words between them and the deceased who emerged from his house in response to the challenge. Shahabuddin (P. W. 1) then intervened and asked one Ranga to take away the deceased. Ranga accompanied the deceased to the house of one Jayawanta.
The other 13 accused armed with sticks joined accused Nos. 1, 3, 15 and 16 and then all the 17 of them reached the house of Jayawanta and demanded that the door thereof be opened failing which they threatened to smash it. Not having been obliged by the inmates they broke open the door, dragged the deceased out of the house and took him to the chowk where he was beaten by them with sticks. He fell to. the ground but the beating was continued.
Zainabbi (P. W. 10) who is the wife of Shahabuddin (P. W. 1) ran to the police patil of the village, namely, Laxman (P. W. 13) while the beating was in progress and told him that the deceased was being belaboured by accused Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 14. The patil went to the scene of the occurrence, found the deceased lying injured and in a serious condition and asked him as to who had beaten him. The deceased responded with the word "Karpude",
A cot was arranged and the deceased was taken therein by the patil and others to the hospital at Chakur which lies at a distance of 10 miles from village Janval and on the way to which Amirali breathed his last. The party carryin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.