SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 199

A.V.VARADARAJAN, BAHARUL ISLAM, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Pralhad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT:- This appeal under Section 2 of the SC (Enlargement of Jurisdiction) Act is directed against the judgment of the Bombay High Court convicting the appellant under Section 302 Indian Penal Code to imprisonment for life after reversing he order of acquittal passed by the Sessions Judge.

2. The facts and circumstances of the case have been detailed in the judgments of the Courts below and need not be repeated here.

3. It appears that on July 31, 1974 at about 3 p. m. there was a scuffle between the appellant Pralhad and the deceased Ghanshyam in the course of which Pralhad is alleged to have caused stab injuries on the person of the deceased as a result of which he fell down and ultimately died. FIR was lodged by Tulsi Das a brother of the deceased. After the usual investigation, charge-sheet was submitted against the accused who were put up on trial before the Sessions Judge who, however, while finding that the case of homicide as made out by the prosecution was proved, held that the complicity of the appellant in the crime had not been established beyond reasonable doubt. Thereafter, the State filed appeal in the High Court. The High Court after a very careful consideration a








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top