SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 516

A.P.SEN, P.N.BHAGWATI
Official Liquidator Of High Court Of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
V. Lakshmikutty – Respondent


Advocates:
P.A.RAMESH, R.S.CHITALE

Judgment

P. N. BHAGWATI, J.:- We think that the view taken by the High Court is the correct view on the interpretation of Sections 529 and 530 of the Companies Act, 1956. Section 529 provides that in the winding up of an insolvent company, the same rules shall prevail and be observed with regard to the provable debts as are in force for the time being under the law of insolvency with respect to the estate of persons adjudged insolvent. This provision brings in the applicability of Section 46 of the Provincial Insolvency Act which reads:

"Where there have been mutual dealings between an insolvent and a creditor proving or claiming to prove a debt under this Act, an account shall be taken of what is due from the one party to the other in respect of such mutual dealings, and the sum due from the one party shall be set off against, any sum due from the other party, and the balance of the account, shall be claimed or paid on either side respectively."

This rule enacted in Section 46 of the Provincial Insolvency Act with regard to the debts provable by a creditor against the insolvent must, therefore, likewise apply in regard to debts provable against a company in winding up. Consequently,






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top