SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
V.R. KRISHNA IYER AND O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, JJ.
Deep Chand Gobind Ram Asnani, Appellant
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 2813 of 1979, D/- 26-3-1980.
Pensionary and Other Retiral Benefits - Settlement of Claims - Appeal which had been heard at some length ended up at a certain stage by a suggestion from Court to State to take a realistic view of situation apart from merits of matter - A sum of Rs. 50,000/- had been deposited in trial court by State when a decree was passed against it and in favour of appellant - This sum was withdrawn by appellant although decree itself was reversed by High Court - In this court, appellant put forward many contentions which were contested by State-respondent – Held, At end of it all, Court felt that without detailed consideration of merits of matter and having regard to fact that appellant was absolutely indigent, Government may allow appellant to keep a sum of Rupees 50,000/- in full settlement of all his claims including pensionary and other retiral benefits - Counsel for State today represents that State has given respectful consideration to Courts suggestion and his persuasion and has accepted direction that a sum of Rs. 50,000/- be paid to appellant in full - This sum need not be paid now because it has already been withdrawn by appellant - Thus Court direct that appellant be entitled to a sum of Rs. 50,000/- in full settlement of all his claims and that State need not pay any amount because appellant has already received same by withdrawal from trial court - In exercise of Court jurisdiction to award costs and having regard to equities of situation and in circumstances of case, Court make a direction that appellant be paid by State a sum of Rs. 10,000/- by way of costs - This sum will be deposited in three months from today - Appellant will have no more claim whatever - Appeal disposed of.
Judgment
KRISHNA IYER, J.:- This appeal which had been heard at some length ended up at a certain stage by a suggestion from the Court to the State to take a realistic view of the situation apart from the merits of the matter. A sum of Rs. 50,000/- had been deposited in the trial court by the State when a decree was passed against it and in favour of the appellant. This sum was withdrawn by the appellant although the decree itself was reversed by the High Court. In this court, the appellant put forward many contentions which were contested by the State-respondent. At the end of it all, we felt that without detailed consideration of the merits of the matter and having regard to the fact that the appellant was absolutely indigent, the Government may allow the appellant to keep a sum of Rupees 50,000/- in full settlement of all his claims including pensionary and other retiral benefits. Counsel for the State Shri Lalit today represents that the State has given respectful consideration to the Courts suggestion and his persuasion and has accepted the direction that a sum of Rs. 50,000/- be paid to the appellant in full. This sum need not be paid now because it has already been withdrawn by the appellant. Thus we direct that the appellant be entitled to a sum of Rs. 50,000/- in full settlement of all his claims and that the State need not pay any amount because the appellant has already received the same by withdrawal from the trial court.
2. In exercise of our jurisdiction to award costs and having regard to the equities of the situation and in the circumstances of the case, we make a direction that the appellant be paid by the State a sum of Rs. 10,000/- by way of costs. This sum will be deposited in three months from today. The appellant will have no more claim whatever. The appeal is disposed of as above.
Order accordingly.
For Citation : AIR 1981 SC 1635
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.