SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 347

R.S.PATHAK, BAHARUL ISLAM, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Bimal Chand Jain – Appellant
Versus
Gopal Agarwal – Respondent


Advocates:
K.K.Mohan, P.S.NORIMAN, PRAMOD SVARUP, R.K.GARG, SUNIL KUMAR JAIN

Judgment

PATHAK J.:- In a suit for ejectment of a lessee and for recovery of arrears of rent, does the court enjoy any discretion not to strike off the defence in case the defendant has defaulted in depositing the rent and has also failed to make any representation within the terms of R. 5 of O. XV, civil P. C.? That question is raised in this defendants appeal by special leave against an order of the Allahabad High Court maintaining in revision that the trial court has no discretion in the circumstances but must strike off the defence.

2. The respondent as lessor filed a suit against the appellant as lessee for his ejectment and for recovery of arrears of rent. The appellant filed a written statement and resisted the suit. During the pendency of the suit the respondent filed an application praying that the appellants defence be struck off in view of R. 5. of O. XV, Civil P. C. inasmuch as the appellant had committed default in depositing the rent regularly. The appellant opposed the application and attempted to show that he had been depositing the rent as required by the law The trial court held that while the rental arrears admitted by the appellant to be due had been deposited in














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top