R.S.PATHAK, BAHARUL ISLAM, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Bimal Chand Jain – Appellant
Versus
Gopal Agarwal – Respondent
Judgment
PATHAK J.:- In a suit for ejectment of a lessee and for recovery of arrears of rent, does the court enjoy any discretion not to strike off the defence in case the defendant has defaulted in depositing the rent and has also failed to make any representation within the terms of R. 5 of O. XV, civil P. C.? That question is raised in this defendants appeal by special leave against an order of the Allahabad High Court maintaining in revision that the trial court has no discretion in the circumstances but must strike off the defence.
2. The respondent as lessor filed a suit against the appellant as lessee for his ejectment and for recovery of arrears of rent. The appellant filed a written statement and resisted the suit. During the pendency of the suit the respondent filed an application praying that the appellants defence be struck off in view of R. 5. of O. XV, Civil P. C. inasmuch as the appellant had committed default in depositing the rent regularly. The appellant opposed the application and attempted to show that he had been depositing the rent as required by the law The trial court held that while the rental arrears admitted by the appellant to be due had been deposited in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.