SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 56

A.D.KOSHAL, BAHARUL ISLAM
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Raja Ram – Respondent


Judgment

BAHARUL ISLAM, J.:- This appeal by the State of Punjab and two others, namely, the Collector, Rupar District and the Sub-Divisional Officer (Civil)-cum-Land Acquisition Collector, Rupar is on a certificate granted by a Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in respect of its judgment in a Letters Patent Appeal holding the acquisition of the land in question to be bad in law on the ground that the Food Corporation of India for which the Land in question was sought to be acquired was not a Company within the meaning of S. 3 (e) of the Land Acquisition Act that the land had also not been acquired for a public purpose and that the State could acquire the land under that Act only for a public purpose or for the purpose of a Company.

2. The material facts of the case may be stated thus. Nine Biswas of the disputed land situated within the municipal area of Morinda in the District of Rupar was owned by respondent No. 1, Raja Ram, respondents Nos. 2 and 3 are Raja Rams sons. The State of Punjab issued a notification dated December 17, 1968 under S. 4 read with S. 17 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 (hereinafter called "the L. A. Act"). The notification related to






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top