A.V.VARADARAJAN, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI
Satpal – Appellant
Versus
Hira Lal – Respondent
Judgment
FAZAL ALI, J.:- We have heard counsel for the parties and have gone through the judgments of the courts below. We find no merit is this appeal. Special leave appears to have been granted only on the question of notice which no longer survives in view of a 7-Judge Bench decision of this court holding that in cases governed by the Rent Act, no notice under S. 106 T. P. Act is necessary unless expressly so provided. The appeal is accordingly dismissed but, in the circumstances, without any order as to costs.
2. Time till 30th September, 1981 is allowed to vacate the premises and to hand over vacant possession to the respondent-landlord, subject to filing the usual undertaking within six weeks from today. In the meantime, the appellant shall pay compensation equivalent to rent regularly and will also carry out all necessary repairs at his own costs without being reimbursed by the respondent.
Appeal dismissed.
For Citation : AIR 1981 SC 1738
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.