SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 315

A.P.SEN, E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, R.S.PATHAK
Jamnaprasad Kanhaiyalal – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax, M. P. , Bhopal – Respondent


Judgment

SEN, J. (For himself and on behalf of Venkataramiah, J.):- This is a direct reference under S. 257 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Jabalpur (for short, the Appellate Tribunal), at the instance of the assessee. The reference is necessitated due to divergence of opinion, as, reflected in the various decisions of different High Courts, with respect to the scope and effect of the Voluntary Disclosure Scheme under S. 24 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1965 (the Act, for short).

2. The assessee, Messrs. Jamnaprasad Kanhaiyalal, is a partnership firm. The firm consists of 4 partners, namely, Kanhaiyalal and his 3 major sons, Rajkumar, Swatantrakumar, and Santoshkumar with his minor son Satishkumar admitted to the benefits of the partnership. In the course of assessment proceedings for the assessment year 1967-68, the relevant accounting year of which was the year ending Diwali, 1966, the Income-tax officer (ITO, for short) noticed in the books of account of the assessee five cash credits of Rs. 9,250 each, in the names of five sons of Kanhaiyalal, as detailed below :

Rs.

Sailendrakumar 5 yrs. 9,250/-

Satishkumar 9 yrs. 9,250/-

Sunilkumar 7 yrs. 9,2









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top