SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 123

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
V.R. KRISHNA IYER AND N.L. UNTWALIA, JJ.
Sohan Singh and others, Appellants
Versus
The General Manager, Ordnance Factory, Khamaria, Jabalpur and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 914 (NL) of 1972, D/-18-3-1975.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 133 (1) (a) - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 33-C (2) - Labour - Terms and Conditions of Service - Appellants had filed seven applications before Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court - Applications were allowed and certain directions were given by Labour Court for quantification of claims of appellants - Whether applicants were transferred to Ordnance Factory Khamaria on same terms and conditions of service which they had at Meerut and they willingly accented reduced pay and a new assignment in Khamaria Ordnance – Held, High Court seems to have taken view that trial of such an issue was beyond competence of labour court but it has rightly been pointed out on behalf of appellants that instead of challenging competence of jurisdiction of labour court; to try issue No. 4, respondents went to trial, submitted to its jurisdiction and when a decision was given against them by labour court, they, for first time, challenged its jurisdiction to try that issue in High Court - On facts of this case, therefore, Court is satisfied that High Court ought not to have entertained point of jurisdiction urged an behalf of respondents and set aside order of labour court on that ground alone - Appeal allowed.

Judgment

UNTWALIA, J..- This is an appeal by certificate under Art. 133 (1) (a) of the Constitution as it stood before the 30th Constitution (Amendment) Act from the order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court passed in Miscellaneous Petition No. 280 of 1970 filed by the respondents. The appellants had filed seven applications before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur under Section 33-C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The applications were allowed and certain directions were given by the Labour Court for quantification of the claims of the appellants. The High Court in the Writ Petition filed by the respondents has not examined the merits of the order of the Labour Court. It has set aside that order on the ground that on the facts and circumstances of this case the applications under Section 33-C (2) were not entertainable by the Labour Court. We think that the view taken by the High Court on the facts of this case is not correct because the jurisdiction of the labour court was not challenged by the respondents in that court. Issue No. 4 settled for trial by the labour court was in the following terms :

"Whether the applicants were transferred to Ordnance Factory Khamaria on same terms and conditions of service which they had at Meerut and they willingly accented the reduced pay and a new assignment in Khamaria Ordnance ?

The High Court seems to have taken the view that the trial of such an issue was beyond the competence of the labour court but it has rightly been pointed out on behalf of the appellants that instead of challenging the competence of the jurisdiction of the labour court; to try issue No. 4, the respondents went to trial, submitted to its jurisdiction and when a decision was given against them by the labour court, they, for the first time, challenged its jurisdiction to try that issue in the High Court. On the facts of this case, therefore, we are satisfied that the High Court ought not to have entertained the point of jurisdiction urged an behalf of the respondents and set aside the order of the labour court on that ground alone.

2. We therefore allow this appeal, set aside the order of the High Court remit the case back to it with a direction to re-hear the Miscellaneous Petition on merits and disclose it of according to law. There will be no order as to costs.

Appeal allowed.

For Citation : AIR 1981 SC 1862

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top