SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 3

A.V.VARADARAJAN, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Virendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

ORDER:- This petition has been filed by the son-in-law of the detenu praying that the detenu may be released as the constitutional safeguards contained in Art. 22 (5) of the Constitution have not been complied with. Admittedly, the order of detention was passed on 9-10-1980 and the grounds were supplied to the detenu on 1-11-1980 when he was arrested but without the documents and materials which were supplied on 5-11-1980. The detenu made a representation on 13-11-1980 which was disposed of on 13-12-1980. In this case as the documents and the materials forming the basis of the order of detention had not been supplied to the detenu along with the order of detention when the same was served on him, the order is rendered void as held by this Court in Smt. Icchu Devi Choraria v. Union of India, (1980) 4 SCC 531 and in Smt. Shalini Soni v. Union of India, (1980) 4 SCC 544. Moreover, the order of detention suffers from another infirmity, namely, that the representation made by the detenu was disposed of by the detaining authority more than a month after the representation was sent to it. No reasonable explanation for this delay has been given which violates the constitutional saf


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top