SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 404

E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, P.N.BHAGWATI
Kapurchand Shrimal – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax, A. P. , Hyderabad – Respondent


Advocates:
A.SUBBA RAO, A.Subhashini, S.C.Manchanda

Judgment

VENKATARAMIAH, J.:- The only question which arises for consideration in these six appeals by certificate is whether an order of assessment passed under the Income-tax Act 1922 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the I.-T. O. in the case of a H. U. F. without holding an inquiry into the validity of the claim made within a reasonable time by a member of the Hindu family that a partition had taken place among the members of the family is liable to be merely cancelled in appeal by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (for short, the Tribunal) without a further direction to the assessing authority either to modify the assessment suitably or to pass a fresh order of assessment in accordance with law.

2. The assessee is a Hindu undivided family and the assessment years are 1955-56 and 1957-58 to 1961-62. An assessment order made on May 30, 1959 in respect of the assessment year 1955-56 had been set aside by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner on February 24, 1962, with a direction to make a fresh assessment. When fresh assessment proceedings were commenced pursuant to the above said direction in respect of the assessment year 1955-56. the assessment proceedings for the assessment






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top