SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 136

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
BEFORE V.D. TULZAPURKAR AND O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, JJ.
PREMJIT KAUR
Versus
HARSINDER SINGH
Criminal Appeal No. 204 of 1980
Decided on 17-3-1980

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 191, 192 and 193 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 195(1)(b)(i) - View of High Court being Clearly Erroneous - Court have heard counsel on both sides and Court is satisfied that view of High Court is clearly erroneous that simply because Sections 191 and 192, Indian Penal Code, are not mentioned in Section 195(1)(b)(i), Criminal Procedure Code, sanction for prosecution could not be issued - Obviously Section 191 and 192,. Indian Penal Code, are sections which define offences for which punishment is provided for in Section 193 and Section 193 is admittedly mentioned in Section 195(1)(b)(i), Criminal Procedure Code - View of High Court being clearly erroneous Court feel that judgment High Court be quashed – Court accordingly quash same – Court would however, like to observe that it will be open to respondent to raise whatever defence he wants to raise in prosecution that may be launched against him.

JUDGMENT

Tulzapurkar, J. —

2. We have heard counsel on both sides and we are satisfied that the view of the High Court is clearly erroneous that simply because Sections 191 and 192, Indian Penal Code, are not mentioned in Section 195(1)(b)(i), Criminal Procedure Code, sanction for prosecution could not be issued. Obviously Section 191 and 192,. Indian Penal Code, are the sections which define offences for which punishment is provided for in Section 193 and Section 193 is admittedly mentioned in Section 195(1)(b)(i), Criminal Procedure Code. The view of the High Court being clearly erroneous we feel that the judgment the High Court be quashed. We accordingly quash the same. We would however, like to observe that it will be open to the respondent to raise whatever defence he wants to raise in the prosecution that may be launched against him.

For Citation : (1982)2 SCC 167

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top