SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 257

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
BEORE V.R. KRISHNA IYER, R.S. PATHAK AND O. CHINNAPPA REDDY. JJ.
DINA NATH
Versus
HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING BOARD AND OTHERS
Civil Appeal No. 1063 of 1980
Decided on 7-5-1980

Headnote:

Lower Post - Salary - Lower Scale of Pay - Himachal Pradesh Housing Board had employed appellant as Manager on a scale and salary at time of his joining was fixed having regard to his qualifications - Later Board - respondent - felt that post was too big and salary was too high and abolished post altogether - They downgraded post to that Factory manager on a new lower scale - whether appellant was willing to accept lower post on lower scale of pay and he agree to accept it – Held, Counsel for respondent tells Court now that because appellant is a Chemical Engineer, he is not suitable for post – Court is unable to agree - Board knowing his qualifications, had appointed his in higher post - What is more it is represented by counsel for Board that even in high Court Board had offered to appoint appellant in downgraded post – Court is satisfied that just course in circumstanced, if Board is acting bona fide, is to appoint appellant to lower post of Factory manager – Court direct respondent to do so within one month from today on a scale but having regard to circumstances of case, it is obvious that justice requires his appointment to be at top point in the scale, that is, Rs 1100 per mensem.

ORDER

Krishna Iyer, J. — The Himachal Pradesh Housing Board had employed the appellant as Manager on a scale from Rs 800 to Rs 1600 and the salary at the time of his joining was fixed at Rs 1150 having regard to his qualifications. Later the Board - respondent - felt that the post was too big and the salary was too high and abolished the post altogether. They downgraded the post to that the Factory manager on a new lower scale of Rs. 400-1100. When the case came up on an earlier occasion we put it to the appellant whether he was willing to accept the lower post on the lower scale of pay and he agree to accept it. Counsel for the respondent tells us now that because the appellant is a Chemical Engineer, he is not suitable for the post. We are unable to agree. The Board knowing his qualifications, had appointed his in the higher post. What is more it is represented by the counsel for the Board that even in the high Court the Board had offered to appoint the appellant in the downgraded post. We are satisfied that the just course in the circumstanced, if the Board is acting bona fide, is to appoint the appellant to the lower post of Factory manager. We direct the respondent to do so within one month from today on a scale of Rs. 400-1100 but having regard to the circumstances of the case, it is obvious that justice requires his appointment to be at the top point in the scale, that is, Rs 1100 per mensem.

For Citation : (1982)2 SCC 51

Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top