SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 257

O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, R.S.PATHAK, V.R.KRISHNA IYER
Dina Nath – Appellant
Versus
H. P. Housing Board – Respondent


ORDER

Krishna Iyer, J. — The Himachal Pradesh Housing Board had employed the appellant as Manager on a scale from Rs 800 to Rs 1600 and the salary at the time of his joining was fixed at Rs 1150 having regard to his qualifications. Later the Board - respondent - felt that the post was too big and the salary was too high and abolished the post altogether. They downgraded the post to that the Factory manager on a new lower scale of Rs. 400-1100. When the case came up on an earlier occasion we put it to the appellant whether he was willing to accept the lower post on the lower scale of pay and he agree to accept it. Counsel for the respondent tells us now that because the appellant is a Chemical Engineer, he is not suitable for the post. We are unable to agree. The Board knowing his qualifications, had appointed his in the higher post. What is more it is represented by the counsel for the Board that even in the high Court the Board had offered to appoint the appellant in the downgraded post. We are satisfied that the just course in the circumstanced, if the Board is acting bona fide, is to appoint the appellant to the lower post of Factory manager. We direct the respondent to do so wit


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top