D.A.DESAI, A.P.SEN
Administrator, Ranchi Municipal Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Kamakhya Narain Singh – Respondent
ORDER
1. We have heard My Attorney General for the petitioner ard Mr B.C. Ghose for the respondents.
2. In view of the points made in the transfer petition and in view of the fact that Civil Appeal No. 2889 of 1980 pending in this Court in the case of Kamakhya Narain Singh raises certain questions which would have an impact on the decision of C.W.J.Cs. Nos. 802 ar,cl ^05 of 1S80 pending in the High Court of Patna, Ranchi Bench, Ranchi and in order to avoid any conflict of decisions ia thesa cases, we direct that C.W.J. Nos. 802 and 805 of 1980 pending in the High Court of Patna, Ranchi Bench., Ranchi,be withdrawn and stand transferred to this Court and be heard along with G.A. No. 2889 of 1980 pending in this Court. The connected petitions for amendment cf Writ Petitions Nos. 802 and 805 of 1930 shall also stand transferred to this Court for disposal.
3. There shall be no order as to costs.
For Citation : (1982) 3 SCC 387
Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.