SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(SC) 11

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, D.A. DESAI AND A. VARADARAJAN, JJ.
Mohd. Salim Khan, Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P., Respondent.
Writ Petn. No. 5064 of 1981
Decided on 12-1-1982.

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Writ petition - Detention – Acquitted - In this writ petition it appears that petitioner was arrested between night and since then he has been in detention although it is alleged by other side that there are several serious cases pending against him and a list was also given but was directed to produce a single case in which any chargesheet was submitted against him and despite sufficient opportunity having been given to him he has not been able to produce such record - In these circumstances therefore we are left with no alternative but to release petitioner from jail custody - Court are constrained to observe that as liberty of subject was involved in this case it is extremely regrettable that State should act in such a casual or cavalier manner and was even unable to produce any evidence or document to show why petitioner was detained without trial for a period of about - Held We may also point out that position becomes still worse when informs that some of cases against petitioner were tried and he was acquitted - In these circumstances we direct that petitioner be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of before Jail Superintendent who will forward same to Magistrate concerned - Let a copy of this order be sent to Secretary of State Government - Order accordingly

JUDGMENT

FAZAL ALI, J. :— In this writ petition it appears that the petitioner was arrested between the night of 29th and 30th Nov. 1978 and since then he has been in detention although it is alleged by the other side that there are several serious cases pending against him and a list was also given but Mr. Bhatt was directed to produce a single case in which any charge-sheet was submitted against him and despite sufficient opportunity having been given to him he has not been able to produce such record. In these circumstances, therefore, we are left with no alternative but to release the petitioner from jail custody. We are constrained to observe that as the liberty of the subject was involved in this case it is extremely regrettable that the State should act in such a casual or cavalier manner and was even unable to produce any evidence or document to show why the petitioner was detained without trial for a period of about 3 years. We may also point out that the position becomes still worse when Mr. Bhatt informs that some of the cases against the petitioner were tried and he was acquitted. In these circumstances, we direct that the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 500/- before the Jail Superintendent who will forward the same to the Magistrate concerned. Let a copy of this order be sent to the Secretary (Home) of the State Government. This order covers all the cases which may be pending against the petitioner.

Order accordingly.

For Citation : AIR 1982 SC 1096

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top