SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 127

S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI
Shyam Sunder – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

JUDGMENT:— This appeal in our opinion must succeed on a short point. The admitted facts are that the criminal appeal filed by the appellant before the Rajasthan High Court was initially presented in Jodhpur which is the headquarter of the High Court. A counsel from Jodhpur was engaged by the appellant to argue the appeal. While the appeal was pending in the Jodhpur Bench it was transferred to the Bench at Jaipur without serving any notice on the appellant. The appellant has stated in affidavit that even his counsel at Jodhpur did not inform him that the appeal had been transferred to Jaipur and will be heard there. In these circumstances, the appeal was heard by the Bench at Jaipur in the absence of the accused, as would appear from the judgment itself, counsel for the State of Rajasthan has not denied these facts and has conceded that as the appeal had been decided without hearing the accused he would not have any objection if the appeal is remitted to the High Court at Jaipur for rehearing in presence of the accused. Although the High Court at Jaipur has given reasons for dismissing the appeal the fact remains that as the accused was not represented the possibility of th



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top