SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 353

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, A.P. SEN AND BAHARUL ISLAM, JJ.
The Allahabad Dist. Co-op. Ltd., Appellant
Versus
 Hannman Dutt Tewari, Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 2219 of 1970
Decided on29-7-1981.

Headnote:

Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act - S. 70 - Business of co-operative society - Suit is barred by provisions of S. 70 - Whether suit filed by respondent for a declaration that retrenchment of his services by appellant Allahabad Distt. Co-op. Ltd., Allahabad, a co-operative society constituted under Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act A (sic) barred by provisions of S. 70 of Act - According tocounsel for appellant, dispute relates to business of co-operative society and, therefore, suit is barred by the provisions of S. 70 - Expression "business of society" has been construed by several decisions of this Court - In Deccan Merchants Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Dalichand Jugraj Jain,. (1969) 1 SCR 887 it was pointed out " word business has been used in a narrower sense and it means actual trading or commercial or other similar business activity of the society which the society is authorised to enter into under the Act and Rules and its bye-laws - Held, Since word business is equated with actual trading or commercial or other similar business activity of society, and since it has been held that it would be difficult to subscribe to proposition that whatever society does or is necessarily required to do for purpose of carrying out its objects such as laying down conditions of service of its employees, can be said to be a part of its business, it would appear that a dispute relating to conditions of service of workmen employed by society cannot be held to be a dispute touching the business of the society - Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT

JUDGMENT: — The only question raised in this appeal is whether the suit filed by the respondent for a declaration that the retrenchment of his services by the appellant Allahabad Distt. Co-op. Ltd., Allahabad, a co-operative society constituted under the Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act A (sic) barred by the provisions of S. 70 of the Act. According to Mr. Pramod Swarup, learned counsel for the appellant, the dispute relates to the business of the co-operative society and, therefore, the suit is barred by the provisions of S. 70.

2. The expression "business of the society" has been construed by several decisions of this Court. In Deccan Merchants Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Dalichand Jugraj Jain,. (1969) 1 SCR 887 it was pointed out "the word business has been used in a narrower sense and it means the actual trading or commercial or other similar business activity of the society which the society is authorised to enter into under the Act and the Rules and its bye-laws." In Co-operative Central Bank. Ltd. v. Additional Industrial Tribunal, Andhra Pradesh, (1970) 1 SCR. 205 it is said "but the meaning given to the expression touching the business of the society, in our opinion makes it very doubtful whether a dispute in respect of alteration of conditions of service can be held to be covered by this expression. Since the word business is equated with the actual trading or commercial or other similar business activity of the society, and since it has been held that it would be difficult to subscribe to the proposition that whatever the society does or is necessarily required to do for the purpose of carrying out its objects such as laying down the conditions of service of its employees, can be said to be a part of its business, it would appear that a dispute relating to conditions of service of the workmen employed by the society cannot be held to be a dispute touching the business of the society."

3. In view of the above pronouncements of this Court, we cannot accept the submission of Shri Pramod Swarup. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with costs.

Appeal dismissed.

For Citation : AIR 1982 SC 120

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top