SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P.N. BHAGWATI AND A.P. SEN, JJ.
Ramji Bhagala, Appellant
Versus
Krishnarao Karirao Bagre and another, Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 1718 of 1980
Decided on 11-8-1980.
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Held, Court find from judgment given by S. K. Desai, J. that he has admitted appeal in so far. as prayer a (i), a (ii) and (a) are concerned and rejected appeal so far as prayer (b) and enquiry for mesne profits are concerned - Learned Judge seems to have proceeded on assumption that there has been a recent amendment in Code of Civil Procedure under which he could admit appeal as to a part and reject it as to other – Court do not find any such amendment in Code nor has any such amendment been brought to Court notice by learned counsel appearing on behalf of parties - Our attention is drawn by Mr. Bhandare, learned advocate appearing on behalf of respondents, to fact that there was a proposal to introduce clause 12A in Order 41 providing for admission of appeal as to a part by that clause does not seem to have found its way into statute – Court would, therefore, set aside order passed by Division Bench affirming order of Mr. Justice S. K. Desai as also order of Mr. Justice S. K. Desai and remand appeal to High Court so that High Court may consider whether appeal should be admitted wholly or rejected wholly - Appeal allowed.
JUDGMENT
JUDGMENT :— We find from the judgment dated 5th October, 1979 given by S. K. Desai, J. that he has admitted the appeal in so far. as prayer a (i), a (ii) and (a) are concerned and rejected the appeal so far as prayer (b) and the enquiry for mesne profits are concerned. The learned Judge seems to have proceeded on the assumption that there has been a recent amendment in the Code of Civil Procedure under which he could admit the appeal as to a part and reject it as to the other. We do not find any such amendment in the Code nor has any such amendment been brought to our notice by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. Our attention is drawn by Mr. Bhandare, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents, to the fact that there was a proposal to introduce clause 12A in Order 41 providing for admission of appeal as to a part by that clause does not seem to have found its way into the statute. We would, therefore, set aside the order passed by the Division Bench affirming the order of Mr. Justice S. K. Desai as also the order of Mr. Justice S. K. Desai and remand the appeal to the High Court so that the High Court may consider whether the appeal should be admitted wholly or rejected wholly. There will be no order as to costs of the present appeal.
Appeal allowed.
For Citation : AIR 1982 SC 1223
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.