SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 97

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI AND P.S. KAILASAM, JJ.
Qamruddin, Appellant
Versus
 Acqeel and others, Respondents.
Criminal Appeal No. 138 of 1980
Decided on 25-4-1980.

Headnote:

Acquitting of Charges - Convicted Accused - Special Leave - Appeal by Special Leave is directed against an order of High Court allowing appeal and acquitting respondents of charges framed against them – Held, Trial Court had convicted accused on a full and complete appraisal of evidence - High Court in appeal has written a very cryptic judgment and has not tried to displace some of important reasons given by trial Court nor has it made any attempt to scan intrinsic merits of evidence – Court is satisfied that judgment of High Court is not in accordance with law - In these circumstances therefore Court remand case to High Court for fresh disposal according to law - Respondents will continue to remain on bail, so long as appeal is decided by High Court - It is however open to appellant to move High Court for cancellation of bail if respondents misuse their privilege - Any observations made by Court have been made only for purpose of this appeal and will not prejudice decision of High Court on merits - Appeal allowed.

JUDGMENT

FAZAL ALI, J. :— This appeal by Special Leave is directed against an order of the High Court of Allahabad 9-5-1978 allowing the appeal and acquitting the respondents of the charges framed against them.

2. We have gone through the judgment of the Allahabad High Court and have also heard counsel for the parties.

3. The trial Court had convicted the accused on a full and complete appraisal of the evidence. The High Court in appeal has written a very cryptic judgment and has not tried to displace some of the important reasons given by the trial Court nor has it made any attempt to scan the intrinsic merits of the evidence. We are satisfied that the judgment of the High Court is not in accordance with the law. In these circumstances therefore we allow this appeal and remand the case to the High Court for fresh disposal according to law. The respondents will continue to remain on bail, so long as the appeal is decided by the High Court. It is however open to the appellant to move the High Court for cancellation of the bail if the respondents misuse their privilege. Any observations made by us have been made only for the purpose of this appeal and will not prejudice the decision of the High Court on merits.

Appeal allowed.

For Citation : AIR 1982 SC 1229 (1)

Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top