SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(SC) 118

A.V.VARADARAJAN, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
T. N. Saxena – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

FAZAL ALI, J. :— This appeal by special leave is directed against a judgment dated 18-5-1979 of the Allahabad High Court quashing the impugned seniority list dated 4-4-1977 issued by the Government of U. P. (hereinafter referred to as the Government) which resulted in the reversion of respondents 2 to 5 to lower posts.

2. The facts of the case lie within a narrow compass and, in our opinion, seem to be concluded by several decisions of this Court. Respondents 2 to 5 had passed the High School Examination and entered the service of the Government as Marketing Inspectors tinder the establishment of Food & Supplies Department on various dates and were later confirmed on these posts. In fact, to begin with, the Department itself was temporary but was later on made permanent. It may be stated here that the post of Marketing Inspector was exempted from the scope of the Public Service Commission. The next higher post in the hierarchy of the Department was that of Senior Marketing Inspector and previous to the year 1964 these posts were filled entirely by promotion from Marketing Inspectors. As respondents 2 to 5 were already confirmed in their original post of Marketing Inspector,









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top