SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 508

R.B.MISRA, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI
E. Mahboob Saheb – Appellant
Versus
N. Sabbarayan Chowdhary – Respondent


Advocates:
A.V.RANGAM, G.NARASIMHULU, J.RAMA CHANDRA RAO, K.RAM KUMAR, P.GOVINDAN NAYAR, T.S.KRISHNAMURTHY IYER

JUDGMENT

BALAKRISHNA ERADI, J. :— This appeal by special leave is directed against a judgment of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in two connected Second Appeals - Second Appeals Nos. 719 and 826 of 1967. Those Second Appeals arose out of a suit filed by the appellant herein for setting aside the summary order passed in E. A. No. 90 of 1958 in E. P. 7 of 1956 in O. S. No. 26 of 1952 on the file of the Sub-Court, Anantapur, and for recovery of possession of plaint C Schedule property or, in the alternative, for partition arid recovery of one-half of the property described in the plaint B Schedule. The plaint C Schedule plot is a southern portion of the property described in the B Schedule.

2. The plaint B Schedule property consisting of 1 acre and 90 cents of land together with two houses situated therein belonged to one Allabaksh. He was adjudged an insolvent and the Official Receiver sold a half right in the said property to one Moola Narayanaswamy under Exh. A-3 dated December 6, 1939. The remaining half interest in the property belonging to Allabaksh was also subsequently brought to sale by the Official Receiver and one J. Narasimhulu became the purchaser. Exh. A-27 dated January















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top