SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 486

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Y.V. CHANDRACHUD, CJI., D.A. DESAI, J.
Western Coalfields Ltd., Appellant
Versus
Special Area Development Authority, Korba and another, Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 1025-26 of 1978 and 213 of 1979
Decided on 26-11-1981.
AND
Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd., Appellant
Versus
Special Area Development Authority, Korba and others, Respondents.
Advocates appeared
 Mr. L. N. Sinha, Attorney General, Mr. R. B. Datar and Miss A. Subhashini, Advocates with him for Appellants; Mr. Y. S. Dharamadhikari, Sr. Advocate, Dr. N. M. Ghatate and Mr. S. V. Deshpande, Advocates with him for Respondents; Dr. Y. S. Chitale, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Suresh Sethi and Mr. S. K. Bhattacharya, Advocates with him for Applicant intervener - Municipal Corporation of Delhi; Mr. Altaf Ahmed, Advocate for Applicant intervener J and K. State Agro. Industrial Corpn. Ltd.; Mr. S. K. Gambhir, Advocate for Applicant intervener State of M. P.
* 1. Misc. Petn. Nos 61 and 62 of 1978, D/- 15-4-1978, (M. P.) and
2. 1978 Jab LJ 494, 1978 Tax LR NOC 182.

Advocates:
A.Subhashini, Altaf Ahmed, L.N.Sinha, N.M.GHATATE, R.B.DATAR, S.K.BHATTACHARJEE, S.K.Gambhir, S.V.DESHPANDEY, SWISH SETHI, Y.C.S.CHITALE, Y.S.Dharmadhikari

Headnote:

Companies Act, 1956 - M. P. Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam. (23 of 1973) - Section 65 and 69 (d) - Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 - Demand for property-tax - legality of – Powers of Special Area Development Authority - To make provision for Planning and development and use of land to make better provision for the Preparation of development Plans and zoning plans - Appellant. Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd., is a Government, company incorporated under Act, 1956, entire share capital being owned by Government of India. Respondent 1, Special Area Development Authority for Korba Special Area, is constituted under S. 65 of Act, 1973 referred to hereinafter as Act of 1973 - That Act was passed by M. P. Legislature in order "to make provision for Planning and development and use of land to make better provision for Preparation of development Plans and zoning plans with a view to ensuring that town planning schemes are made in a proper manner and their execution is made effective; to constitute Town and Country Planning Authority for Proper implementation of town and country development plan; to provide for development and administration of special areas through Special Area Development authority- Held, Since Central Act was primarily concerned with development and regulation of declared industries and not with ownership of industrial undertakings, it was held that State legislature had competence to enact impugned law - Justice Pathak and Justice Koshal, who gave a separate judgment concurring with conclusion of majority, preferred to rest their decision on circumstance that impugned legislation fell within Entry 42, List III - Acquisition and requisition of property - and was therefore within competence of State legislature - High Court has given weighty reasons for rejecting that argument and we endorse those reasons - Court adopt, particularly, reasoning of High Court that in meeting of January 29, 1976. respondent 1 had decided to give up its right to impose octroi tax only - Chairman of respondent 1 therefore, acted beyond scope of his authority in entering into the agreement with appellant Companies, under which respondent 1 bound itself not to impose any tax whatsoever - Appeals dismissed.

JUDGMENT

CHANDRACHUD, CJI. :— These appeals by special leave involve the question of the legality of the demand for property-tax made by respondent 1 on the appellant Companies. Civil Appeal No. 213 of 1979 filed by the Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd. arises out of Misc. Petition No. 555 of 1977 filed by it in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh under Art. 226 of the Constitution. Respondent 1 is the Special Area Development Authority, Korba, District Bilaspur, M. P. respondent 2 is its Chairman and respondent 3 is the State of Madhya Pradesh. Since the three appeals raise similar questions, we will refer to the facts of Civil Appeal No. 213 of 1979 only. Civil Appeals Nos. 1025 and 1026 of 1978 are by Western Coalfields Ltd.

2. The appellant. Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd., is a Government, company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, the entire share capital being owned by the Government of India. Respondent 1, the Special Area Development Authority for the Korba Special Area, is constituted under S. 65 of the M. P. Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam. (23 of 1973), referred to hereinafter as the Act of 1973. That Act was passed by the M. P. Legislature in order "to make provision for Planning and development and use of land to make better provision for the Preparation of development Plans and zoning plans with a view to ensuring that town planning schemes are made in a proper manner and their execution is made effective; to constitute Town and Country Planning Authority for Proper implementation of town and country development plan; to provide for the development and administration of special areas through Special Area Development Authority : to make provision for the compulsory acquisition of land required for the purpose of the development plans and for purposes connected with matters aforesaid". Chapter VIII of the Act, consisting of Ss. 64 to 71. is entitled "Special Areas". S. 64 empowers the State Government to declare any area as a special area by issuing a notification. S. 65 provides that for every Special Area there shall be a Special Area Development Authority consisting of a Chairman and such other members as the Government may determine from time to time. The Chairman and the members of the Development Authority are appointed by the Government. S. 68, which prescribes the functions of the Development Authority, lays down by cls. (v) and (vi) that the Development Authority shall make Provision for the municipal services and municipal management of the Special Area. S. 69, by cls. (c) and (d), confers upon the Development Authority powers for the purpose of municipal administration and for the purpose of taxation. These two clauses of S. 69 and cls. (v) and (vi) of S. 68 were inserted in their present shape by Ordinance 26 of 1975 which came into force on Feb. 27, 1976. The Ordinance was replaced by the M. P. Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh (Sanshodhan) Adhiniyam, 1976 (6 of 1976).

3. Section 69 (d) of the Act of 1973 reads thus :

"69. Powers : The Special Area Development Authority shall -

(d) for the purpose of taxation have the Powers which a municipal corporation or a municipal council has as the case may be, under the Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 (No. 23 of 1956) or the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 (No. 37 of 1961) -

(a) where the municipal corporation or municipal council existed in such area prior to its designation as special area under Section 64, according to the municipal law by which such special area was governed, and

(b) where no municipal corporation or municipal council existed in such area prior to its designation as special area under Section 64, according to such of the aforesaid Acts as the State Government may direct."

Clauses (a) and (b) above are sub-clauses of cl. (d). (They should better have not been so numbered alphabetically since the main clauses themselves are similarly numbered).

4. Since there was no Municipal Corporation or Municipal Council in the Korba Special Area p



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top