SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 263

P.N.BHAGWATI, A.V.VARADARAJAN
Jarnail Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


JUDGMENT

P. N. BHAGWATI, J. :— We are of the view that having regard to the circumstances which the offence took place it is not possible to convict the appellant Jarnail Singh of the offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the I. P. C. since there was no pre-concert between Sarwan Singh and the appellant nor a meeting of minds between them before the offence took place. We, therefore, set aside the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 read with Section 34 I. P. C., and since he merely gave a takwa blow on the ear and caused simple injuries, we alter his conviction to one under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code. We are told that the appellant has already been in jail for about 21/2 years and we, therefore, reduce the sentence imposed upon him to that already undergone by him and direct that he may be set at liberty forthwith.

Order accordingly.

For Citation : AIR 1982 SC 70

Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top