SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 207

A.V.VARADARAJAN, BAHARUL ISLAM, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Roshanali Burhanali Syed – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


JUDGMENT:— This appeal by special leave is confined only to the question of sentence and probation. The learned Sessions Judge was requested to release the appellant on probation having regard to the petty nature of the offence. The Sessions Judge would have accepted the request of the appellant but he was under the impression that under the provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 a person who was above 21 years of age could not be released on probation. The learned Sessions Judge seems to have overlooked the provisions of S. 4 (1) of the Act which does not contain any restriction that the offender must be 21 or below that age although this restriction is to be found in S. 6.

2. We, therefore, allow this appeal to the extent that instead of sentencing the appellant at once to imprisonment, we direct that he may be released on executing a bond of good behaviour for a period of one year and on furnishing two sureties of Rs. 500 each and a personal recognisance bond of the same amount. In case he is found to commit some offence during this period, he will be directed to appear and receive the sentence which has been imposed on him.

Order accordingly.

For Citation : AIR 1982 SC

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top