SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(SC) 54

A.V.VARADARAJAN, E.S.VENKATARAMIAH
Bhikoba Shankar Dhumal – Appellant
Versus
Mohan Lal Punchand Tathed – Respondent


Advocates:
JAYSHRI VAD, NAUNIT LAL, R.N.Poddar, U.R.Lalit

JUDGMENT

VENKATARAMIAH, J.:— This. appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated July 30, 1990 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Special Civil Application No. 1931 of 1975.

2. The question for consideration in this appeal is whether the proceedings commenced with the filing of a return by a person holding on the appointed day land in excess of the ceiling area prescribed by the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961. (hereinafter referred to as the Act) would become infructuous and would have to be dropped if such person dies before a notification containing the declaration regarding surplus held by him is published in the official Gazette under S. 21 of the Act and possession of such surplus land is taken over by the authorities concerned.

3. An extent of land measuring. 211 A. 28 G. bearing Survey No. 34 situated in village Manori, Taluka Rahuri of Ahmednagar district in the State. of Maharashtra belonged to respondents 1 to 4 but was in the possession of their tenant by name Bhikoba on the date of the commencement of the Act, i. e. Jan. 26, 1962, which was the appointed day as defined by S. 2 (4) of the Act.

4. The Act w
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top