SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(SC) 204

D.A.DESAI, R.B.MISRA
Harcharan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
K.B.ROHTAGI, R.N.Poddar

ORDER:- Special Leave granted.

2. By a notification dated June 29, 1966,under S. 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (Act for short), respondent State of Haryana acquired land admeasuring 495 bighas, 9 biswas and 12 biswansis pukhta situate in Village Faridabad, for the planned development of Sector 14 of Faridabad Complex. A declaration under S. 6 of the Act followed. Thereafter the Land Acquisition Collector proceeded to determine the compensation on the footing that the land was agricultural land. The measure of compensation determined by him was as under : (i) cultivated land at the rate of Rs. 190/- per biswas pukhta (ii) Banjar jadid and banjar qadia at the rate of Rs. 152/- per biswa pukhta, and (iii) Ghair mumkin land at the rate of Rs. 100/- per biswa pukhta. Various claimants who were covered by the Award sought reference under S. 18 of the Act. The learned District Judge enhanced the compensation in respect of some plantation land but otherwise affirmed the Award of the Land Acquisition Collector. The present appellant filed R. F. A. No. 667 of 1973 in the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh; The High Court proceeded to ascertain and evaluate the market price of the la











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top