A.V.VARADARAJAN, V.D.TULZAPURKAR
B. S. Sambhu – Appellant
Versus
T. S. Krishnaswamy – Respondent
Judgment
The question raised in this appeal is whether sanction under Section 197, Cr. P. C. is required for prosecuting the appellant who at the material time was working as Additional Munsiff and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Madhugiri ?
2. It appears that the respondent, an Advocate, was representing a party (defendant) in Suit No. 522 of 1973 which was being heard by the appellant. An application for transfer of the suit from his Court to some other Court was moved by the defendant before the District Court being Misc. Case No. 30 of 1975. The District Judge alled for remarks from the appellant rearding certain allegations that were made the transfer application. The appellant submitted his remarks in the form of D. O. letter No. 16/75 dated 5th Dec., 1975 wherein he made the following statement :
"In this connection I may also bring to your Honours kind notice that the conduct and character of Sri T. S. Krishnaswamy are not good and that he misbehaves in the open Court making all nonsense allegations. Furher, it is brought to my notice that Shri T. S. Krishnaswamy is a big gambler in this town and is a rowdy also and on account of that he exhibits all sorts of rowdyism in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.