SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(SC) 9

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
E.S. VENKATARAMIAH AND R.B. MISRA, JJ.
Bansropan Singh and others, Appellants
Versus
State of Bihar, Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 9 of 1976, D/- 6-1-1983.
Advocates appeared
Mr. B. P. Singh and Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Advocates, for Appellants; Mr. D. Govardhan, Advocate, for Respondent.

Advocates:
B.P.SINGH, D.GOVERDHAN CHARY, RANJIT GHOSAL

Headnote:Indian Penal Code, 1860-Sections 302, 326 and 149-Conviction of actual assailant under section 302/148-Conviction of 6 co-accused under section 302/149-High Court altering conviction of 6 co-accused from 302/149 to Sections 326/149 while maintaining that of actual assailant-Appeal to Supreme Courts there any ground to interfere with conviction? (No)-Question of reduction in sentence of Six co-accused-High Court awarding 5 years R.I to each-Each undergoing a little more than 2 years and six months before released on bail by Supreme Court-Case pending in Supreme Court for about 6 years-Sentence reduced to period already undergone in respect of accused other than actual assailant-

        Held having regard to the circumstances of this case and the period of more than six years which has elapsed from the date on which they were enlarged on bail, we feel that it would meet the ends of justice if the sentence imposed on each of them is reduced to the sentence already undergone by them. This appeal succeeds only to this limited extent. (Para 5)

Judgment

VENKATARAMIAH, J. :- This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment and order dated August 12, 1975 of the High Court of Patna in Criminal Appeal No. 419 of 1969.

2. The facts of the case are set out in detail in the judgments of the High Court and of the Sessions Court but the few facts which are necessary for the purpose of this appeal are these: The investigation in this case commenced with the receipt of information lodged by Basudeo Kuer (P. W. 2) with the police stating that at about 11.00 A. M. on March 7, 1967 while he (P. W. 2), Jugal Kuer (P. W. 8), Ram Dhari Kuer (P. W. 3) and Sukhdeo (deceased) were sitting near the dera of Vias Kuer (P. W. 9) situated within the jurisdiction of Brahampur Police Station, Sub-Division Buxar, District Shahabad seven persons belonging to village Gayghat, Police Station Brahampur namely Bansropan Singh (A-1), Brahma Singh (A-7), Lakshmi Narain Singh (A-4), Raghunath Singh (A-9), Radhakishun Singh (A-3), Jhakkar Singh alias Sita Ram Singh (A-2) and Jaigovind Mahto (A-8) came towards them variously armed and attacked them and as a consequence of the said attack Basudeo Kuer (P. W. 2), Ramdhari Kuer (P. W. 3), Gulzar Kuer (P. W. 4) and Jugal Kuer (P. W. 8) suffered injuries and Sukhdeo Kuer died. After the completion of the investigation the police filed a charge-sheet against the above seven persons who were alleged to have attacked the prosecution witnesses and the deceased and three others namely Surajnath Singh (A-5) and Sham Bihari Singh (A-6) and one Sheo Pujan Singh for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 379, 302/149, 307, 324 and 323, I. P. C. All the accused except Sheo Pujan Singh were committed to take the trial before the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Shahabad. The learned Sessions Judge at the conclusion of the trial held that Lakshmi Narain Singh (A-4) was guilty of offences punishable under Sections 148 and 302, I. P. C. and Radha Kishun Singh (A-3) Raghu Nath Singh (A-9), Bramha Singh (A-7), Jhakkar Singh alias Sita Ram Singh (A-2), Jaigovind Mahto (A-8) and Bansropan Singh (A-1) were guilty of an offence punishable under Ss. 302/149, I. P. C. and certain other offences. Lakshmi Narain Singh (A-4) was sentenced to imprisonment for life for the offence, punishable under Sec. 302, I. P. C. and each of the other accused referred to above was sentenced to imprisonment for life for the offence punishable under Ss. 302/149, I. P. C. No separate sentences were, however, imposed on any of the said accused regarding the other offences for which they stood convicted. Surajnath Singh (A.5) and Shyam Bihari Singh (A.6) were acquitted of all the charges. Against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge all the seven accused who were convicted by him filed an appeal before the High Court. The State Government filed an appeal against the acquittal of Surajnath Singh (A-5) and Shyam Bihari Singh (A.6). Both the appeals were heard together by the High Court. The High Court confirmed the conviction of Lakshmi Narain Singh (A.4) under Sec. 302, I. P. C. and the sentence of imprisonment for life imposed on him, It, however, altered the conviction of others from one under Ss. 302/149, Indian Penal Code to Ss. 326/149, I. P. C. and each one of them was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years. The conviction of the said accused persons under the other provisions was, however, set aside. The appeal filed by the State Government against Surajnath Singh (A.5) and Shyam Bihari Singh (A.6) was dismissed by the High Court. The seven accused who were convicted by the High Court have filed this appeal.

3. We have been taken through the record of the case by the learned counsel for the parties. Basudeo Kuer (P. W. 2), as mentioned earlier, was the person who lodged the complaint with the police. He had his land in the vicinity of the dera of Vias Kuer (P. W. 9). In his evidence before the Court he substantially supported the allegations contai





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top