SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(SC) 25

V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI, V.D.TULZAPURKAR
Mahant Amar Nath – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.GOHIL, A.K.SEN GUPTA, Harjinder Singh, K.G.Bhagat, PREM MALHOTRA, R.R.L.KOHLI

JUDGMENT:- There is no substance in this criminal appeal which has been preferred by Shri Mahant Amar Nath challenging the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Hissar under Section 319 of Cr. P. C. directing the appellant along with three others should be arraigned as accused in a case being tried before him for offences under Sections 302, 323, 324, 325, 148, 149, 341, 364 and 120-B, I. P. C., which has been confirmed by the High Court in revision.

2. On 18th January, 1980 an incident occurred during the course of which three persons were assaulted in Sanghar-Seerishta village out of whom Munshi Ram died but Gobind Ram and Bachan Singh were injured. In respect of this offence police investigation was undertaken on the basis of the First Information Report lodged by Bachan Singh on 19-1-1980 and the police after recording statements of witnesses challaned 8 accused persons. It appears that the police did not challan Mahant Amar Nath and three others and showed their names in Column 2 of the charge-sheet in spite of the fact that in all the statements which were recorded under Section 161, Cr. P. C. the eye witnesses had stated that these four persons had also participated dir



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top