SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(SC) 16

V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI, V.D.TULZAPURKAR
Mahendra Kumar Shastri – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


ORDER :- We do not find any merit in the contentions urged by the petitioner in the writ petition. The disability which is imposed under Section 62(5) of the Representation of the People Act is equally applicable to all persons similarly situate mentioned therein and they are even prevented from contesting the election or offering themselves as candidates for such election. The provision is reasonable and in public interest to maintain purity in electing peoples representatives and there is no arbitrariness or discrimination involved. Rule is discharged and the writ petition is dismissed.

Rule discharged.

For Citation : AIR 1983 SC 299 = 1984(2) SCC 442 = 1983(1) Scale 27 = 1983 UJ 208

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top