O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Vasanta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :- The appellant in the first instance was convicted by the trial Court under S. 304, Part 2, I. P. C. and sentenced to imprisonment for five years rigorous imprisonment. In the High Court appeals were filed both by the accused-appellant as also by the State. The High Court dismissed the appeal of the accused but allowed the appeal filed by the State and altered the conviction of the appellant from one under Sec. 304, Part 2, I. P. C. to that under S. 302, I. P. C. and sentenced the appellant to imprisonment for life. Hence this appeal before us. The facts have been narrated in the judgment of the High Court and it is not necessary to repeat the same. It appears that there was some verbal altercation as a result of which the deceased had caught the hand of the accused, whereupon the accused assaulted the deceased with a knife with very great force according to medical evidence. In view of the medical evidence and injuries received by the deceased the case squarely falls within four corners of S. 302, I. P. C. Mr. Lalit, however, submits that the case falls under Section 304, Part 2, I. P. C. in view of serious altercations between the parties as held by the trial Court. We
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.