SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(SC) 46

O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Vasanta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
D.K.CHHAYA, M.N.SHROFF, P.H.Parekh, U.U.Lalit, V.N.GANPULE

JUDGMENT :- The appellant in the first instance was convicted by the trial Court under S. 304, Part 2, I. P. C. and sentenced to imprisonment for five years rigorous imprisonment. In the High Court appeals were filed both by the accused-appellant as also by the State. The High Court dismissed the appeal of the accused but allowed the appeal filed by the State and altered the conviction of the appellant from one under Sec. 304, Part 2, I. P. C. to that under S. 302, I. P. C. and sentenced the appellant to imprisonment for life. Hence this appeal before us. The facts have been narrated in the judgment of the High Court and it is not necessary to repeat the same. It appears that there was some verbal altercation as a result of which the deceased had caught the hand of the accused, whereupon the accused assaulted the deceased with a knife with very great force according to medical evidence. In view of the medical evidence and injuries received by the deceased the case squarely falls within four corners of S. 302, I. P. C. Mr. Lalit, however, submits that the case falls under Section 304, Part 2, I. P. C. in view of serious altercations between the parties as held by the trial Court. We


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top