SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
V.D. TULZAPURKAR AND A. VARADARAJAN, JJ.
Om Prakash and others etc., Appellants
Versus
State of U.P., Respondent.
Criminal Appeals Nos. 54 and 55 of 1974, D/- 11-3-1983.
(ii) Indian Penal Code, 1860-Section 396-Appellants, nine in number, convicted for decoity with murder of one Mauji lal in a kotha-Whether having regard to the size of kotha it is probable that appellants armed with various we apons could have been present is that kotha? (Yes) (Para 12)
(iii) Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sec. 396-Conviction of appellants under- Non-examination of Doctor for proving the injuries noticed by him on P.Ws. 2,7 and 8. These witnesses stating that they sustained injuries during occurrence – Whether non-examination of doctor fatal to prosecution? (No) (Para 13)
(iv) Indian Penal Code, 1860-Section 396 - Conviction of appellants under None of the looted properties has been recovered from the appellants-Other incriminating evidence, however, available-Whether it could be held that appellants were the culprits in this case. (Yes) (Para 14)
(v) Indian Penal Code, 1860-Section 396-Conviction of appellants under-Wife of deceased stating that there was sufficient light in kotha due to light of a lantern-Lantern not put to or identified by her - Whether identify of culprits doubtful? (No) (Paras 14 and 16)
(vi) Indian Penal Code, 1860 -Sections 396-Conviction of appellants by courts below whether correct? (Yes)
Held consideration of the evidence of P.W. 2 and of P. Ws. 1, 7 and 80 to the extent that it is corroborated by evidence of P.W. 2 and the other circumstances of the case, namely that the door of the eastern kotha of the house of the deceased was found broken open, that the dead body of Mauji Lal was found lying in the eastern kotha of the house and that the boxes had been found broken open and the locks were found lying nearby in the verandah of the house, we are of the opinion that prosecution has proved the case against the appellants satisfactorily and beyond all reasonable doubt and that the conviction of the appellants for the offence under section 396 Indian Penal Code and the sentence awarded to them by the learned Sessions Judge and confirmed by the learned Judge of the High Court are correct. We accordingly confirm the conviction and sentence and dismiss the appeals. (Para 19)
Judgment
VADARAJAN, J.:- These appeals by special leave are directed against the dismissal of Criminal Appeals Nos. 1918 and 1923 of 1963 by a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court. Those appeals in the High Court were filed against the conviction of nine accused persons, Om Prakash (A-1), Anoop Singh (A-2), Sheo Gopal (A-3), Raj Narain (A-4), Chandra Prakash (A-6), Mool Chand (A-12), Beni Singh (A-16), Ram Pal (A-17) and Lajjar Ram alias Raja Ram (A-18) under S. 396 I. P. C. and the sentence of imprisonment for life awarded to them by the learned Sessions Judge, Kanpur-Etawah at Kanpur in Sessions Trial No. 172 of 1969, in which in all 18 accused persons were tried. The trial Court acquitted the other nine accused, Bhoop Singh (A-5), Virendra (A-7), Ramadhin (A-8), Ranjit (A-9), Chhotay Lal (A-10), Chunni Lal (A-11), Bhanu Prakash (A-13), Dhani Ram (A-14) and Ram Gopal (A-15) in the alleged dacoity with murder at the house of Mauji Lal, Pradhan in Makhauli village, at about 1 A.M. in the night of 16/17-2-1968. In that incident Mauji Lal died and his wife Ram Shree (P. W. 2), Parasuram (P. W. 7) and P. W. 2s brother Ram Shankar (P. W. 8) are stated to have sustained injuries.
2. The case of the prosecution was this: There was enmity between the deceased Pradhan Mauji Lal and his brother Baij Nath (P. W. 1) on one hand and the appellants on the other, eversince the deceased Mauji Lal, fought an election battle in 1955 with Mauji Lal, the father of Om Prakash (A-1) and Bhagwati Prasad, the father of Raj Narain (A-4). There were several cases between the parties. About a month before this occurrence, Mauji Lal had reported by Exh. Ka-7 dated 22-1-1968 that accused persons Om Prakash (A-1) and Sheo Gopal (A-3) had committed theft of timber belonging to the village school managed by him. A few days later on 26-1-1968 Mauji Lal had complained before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Ghatampur that Mool Chand (A-12) forcibly occupied Gaon Sabha land. In 1967 there was rioting in the village, to which the prosecution party and accused belong. In that rioting one Ram Sanehi was murdered on one side and Kanwar Lal was murdered on the other side, and two cases were registered, and Om Prakash (A-1), Sheo Gopal (A-3), Raj Narain (A-4), Ranjit (A-9), Chhotay Lal (All), Mool Chand (A-12), Bhoop Singh (A-5), Rampal (A-17), Lajjar Ram (A-18) and others are accused in one case while in the other case the deceased Mauji Lal and 14 others including Mauji Lals brother Baij Nath (P. W. 1) are accused and those cases were pending even on the date of the occurrence in this case. Om Prakash (A-1), Anoop Singh (A-2) and Sheo Gopal (A-3) are brothers. Raj Narain (A-4), Bhoop Singh (A-5) and Chandra Prakash (A-6) are brothers. Mool Chand (A-12) and Bhanu Prakash (A-13) are brothers, Beni Singh (A-16) is nephew of Dhani Ram (A-14) and Ram Gopal (A-15). Ram Pal (A-17) and Lajjar Ram alias Raja Ram (A-18) are cousins.
3. On the moon-lit night of 16/17-2-1968 deceased Mauji Lal who was Pradhan of the village and his wife Ram Shree (P. W. 2) and their children were sleeping in their house in Makhauli village, Mauji Lal in the western Kotha and P. W. 2 and her children in the eastern Kotha, between which there is a barotha. There was a lighted lantern hanging from a peg at a height of 6 feet from the floor on the eastern wall of the eastern Kotha. Ram Shankar (P. W. 8) the brother of Ram Shree (P. W. 2) who was assisting his deceased brother-in-law Mauji Lal in the cultivation of his lands was sleeping in a tin shed situate west of the western Kotha. The deceased Mauji Lal and his wife Ram Shree (P. W. 2) woke up on hearing some commotion when the miscreants who entered the eastern Kotha of the house were breaking open the northern door, P. W. 2. raised the wick of the lantern, material Exh. III, which had been lowered previously, and there was sufficient light in the Kotha for recognising the miscreants. Mauji Lal had come into the eastern Kotha before its nor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.