SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(SC) 92

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
D.A. DESAI AND AMARENDRA NATH SEN, JJ.
Kiranmal Zumeralal Borana Marwadi, Appellant
Versus
Dnyanoba Bajirao Khot and other, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 2612 of 1983, D/- 7-3-1983.
Advocates appeared
Mr. S. K. Dholakia Advocate for Appellant Mr. S. V. Despande and Dr. N. M. Ghatate Advocates, for Respondents.

Advocates:
N.M.GHATATE, S.K.DHOLAKIA, S.V.DESHPANDEY

Headnote:

Civil Appeal - Special Jurisdiction Suit - Appeal against decision of High Court in First Appeal by which appeal preferred by present appellant against judgment and order of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Special Jurisdiction Suit, was dismissed in limine - High Court dismissed appeal by one word order "Dismissed" - Held, We, therefore, think that this is pre-eminently a fit case which ought to have been admitted and disposed of on merits - As we, remit matter to High Court, we do not express any opinion on contentions of parties - Accordingly, we get aside order of the High Court dismissing appeal in limine and remit case to High Court to dispose it of on merits after hearing parties - Order accordingly.

JUDGMENT:- Special Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against the decision of the High Court in First Appeal No. 536 of 1978 by which the appeal preferred by the present appellant against the judgment and order of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) in Special Jurisdiction Suit No. I of 1974, was dismissed in limine. The High Court dismissed the appeal by one word order "Dismissed". As numerous points both of law and facts appear to have been raised in the appeal, which again were sought to be canvassed before us in fairness to the parties and to us some reasons ought to have appeared in the judgment indicating what appealed to the High Court to be in entire agreement with the learned trial Judge. Let it be remembered that it was the first appeal against the decision of the trial Court and therein the appellant can and has raised serious questions of law and disputed decision on facts. We, therefore, think that this is pre-eminently a fit case which ought to have been admitted and disposed of on merits. As we, remit the matter to the High Court, we do not express any opinion on the contentions of the parties. Accordingly, we get aside the order of the High Court dismissing the appeal in limine and remit the case to the High Court to dispose it of on merits after hearing the parties. There shall be no order as to costs of the hearing in this Court.

Order accordingly.

For Citation : AIR 1983 SC 461

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top