SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
D.A. DESAI AND R.B. MISRA, JJ.
Sarabjeet Singh and others, Appellants
Versus
State of U.P., Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 608 of 1982 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 2077 of 1982), D/- 22-11-1982.
Advocates appeared
Mr. M. K. Garg, Advocate, for Appellants; Mr. D. Bhandari, Advocate for Respondent.
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 147, 427 r/w149, 323 r/w149 and 302 r/w 149 - Ancestral land – Offence of Murder – Appeal against conviction - Genesis of the quarrel lies in a transaction of sale of land belonging to one purchased by P.W. 1 from accused 1 for a consideration of Rs. 1600/- three years prior to July 15, 1972, being date of occurrence - This transaction of sale was not evidenced by any registered deed but P.W. 1 claimed to be in possession and in order to assert his possession he proceeded to construct a wall on nothern, eastern and southern sides of this land - He also constructed a Marha in the north-eastern and another on southern side of his ancestral land - He had put up a thatched room - There was a plot bearing belonging to PW1 which is to east of land of accused 1 was interested in purchasing this plot of land for which he approached Ghirau on a couple of occasions but PW1 was in no mood to transfer this land - In meanwhile, village in which this land is situated was put into consolidation and by a quirk of fate, name of mother of accused 1 was entered on the land which he desired to purchase - Held, This becomes clear from evidence of D.W. 6, Dr. S. K. Shukla, which amongst others, shows that Sarabjeet Singhs left hand had suffered a fracture, not that accused Sarabjeet Singh had any right of private defence and at any rate none against deceased infant Radhey Shyam and, therefore, we did not think it proper to refer to it while examining the evidence against accused 1 but while taking overall view we cannot afford to overlook this aspect - Learned Sessions Judge had found that Ghirau had suffered a damage to tune of Rs. 500/-. This is estimate of P.W. 1 Ghirau himself - We need not question it - Would it be fair to impose a substantive sentence of one year for this offence? Similarly, we find a sentence of one years rigorous imprisonment for offence under S. 147 in facts and circumstances of case to be a little heavy which calls for interference - Having regard to all the circumstances of case, we are of the opinion that sentence of appellants 2 to 10 before us for all offences, namely, Sec. 147, Sec. 427, read, with Sec. 149 and Sec. 323 read with Sec. 149, IPC, be reduced to sentence already undergone - They have already been released on bail - Their bail bonds are cancelled and their appeal to this extent is allowed.
JUDGMENT :- Special leave granted.
2. We heard Mr. Ram Jethmalani learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the State of U. P.
3. The appellant Sarabjeet Singh and 17 other persons were put up on trial before the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Gonda, in Sessions Trial No. A-65/74 for having committed offences under Sections 147, 427 read with 149, 323 read with 149 and 302 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that they committed murder of Radhey Shyam, an infant aged about 4 years, son of P.W. 1 Ghirau, by lifting him and throwing him on the ground. The genesis of the quarrel lies in a transaction of sale of land belonging to one Smt. Koela purchased by P.W. 1 Ghirau from accused 1 Sarabjeet Singh for a consideration of Rs. 1600/- three years prior to July 15, 1972, being the date of occurrence. This transaction of sale was not evidenced by any registered deed but P.W. 1 Ghirau claimed to be in possession and in order to assert his possession he proceeded to construct a wall on the nothern, eastern and southern sides of this land. He also constructed a Marha in the north-eastern and another on the southern side of his ancestral land. He had put up a thatched room. There was a plot bearing No. 1146 belonging to Ghirau which is to the east of the land of accused 1 Sarabjeet Singh and Sarabjeet Singh was interested in purchasing this plot of land for which he approached Ghirau on a couple of occasions but Ghirau was in no mood to transfer this land. In the meanwhile, the village in which this land is situated was put into consolidation and by a quirk of fate, the name of the mother of accused 1 was entered on the land which he desired to purchase. When objections were raised, Sarabjeet Singh approached Ghirau to give a favourable statement before the authorities but he failed to persuade Ghirau. There was thus some embittered relationship between accused 1 Sarabjeet Singh and P.W. 1 Ghirau, the father of the unfortunate innocent victim. On July 15, 1972, P.W. 1 Ghirau, his other son P.W. 2 Pateshwari Prasad, his mother Smt. Koela and his wife Smt. Patiraji were present on their ancestral land in front of his house and the infant Radhey Shyam was playing, near about. At that time, led by accused 1, 17 other named accused and some other unknown and unidentified about 5-6 in number trespassed into the land. The miscreants carried spears and lathis. Accused 1 Sarabjeet Singh gave the usual lalkara that the house of Ghirau be demolished and the inmates of the house be driven out. Accused 1 Sarabjeet Singh and Shobha attacked Ghirau and the remaining accused began demolishing the charni walls and the thatched shed. Smt. Koela came to the rescue of Ghirau but she was pushed aside with the help of a lathi and she suffered injuries. Accused Kameshwari struck a lathi blow on the head of P.W. 2 Pateshwari. At that time accused 1 Sarabjeet Singh lifted infant Radhey Shyam bodily and threw him with some force on the ground. It is the prosecution case that Radhey Shyam suffered some internal injuries and vornitted blood and soon fell into coma. Radhey Shyam was immediately carried to the house. Till about 11 Oclock no one was allowed to come out from the house and thereafter the accused and his companions left. P.W. 1 Ghirau proceeded to police station Lallia and lodged a report of the occurrence which was reduced to writing and is admitted in evidence as Ka-1. The names of accused 1 and 17 others were mentioned in the First Information Report. An offence was registered and P.W. 1 returned to his house when he found that Radhey Shyam had succumbed to his injuries. He returned to the police station and reported about the death of Radhey Shyam and the offence was altered to one under Section 304, IPC. After the usual investigation accused were charge-sheeted as mentioned above.
4. Amongst others, the important witnesses are P.W. 1 Ghirau, P.W. 2 Pateshwari Prasad, P.W. 7 Dr. Nirankar Singh who carried out the au
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.