SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(SC) 37

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
D.A. DESAI AND AMARENDRA NATH SEN, JJ.
Hukumchand Amolikchand Longde and others, Appellants
Versus
Madhava Balaji Potdar and another, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 788 of 1982, D/- 31-1-1983.
Advocates appeared
Mr. E. C. Agarwala, Advocate for Appellants; Mr. S. B. Bhasme, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S. S. Khanduji, Advocate for Respondents.

Advocates:
E.C.AGARWAL, S.B.Bhasme, S.S.Khanduja

Headnote:

Civil Appeal - Ex parte ad interim stay - Execution of - Counsel for respondents, fairly conceded that High Court was in error in not examining revision petition of appellants on merits on short ground that appellants had failed to deposit the rent - Held, Order of High Court dismissing revision petition is liable to be set aside - It is no use of keeping matter pending here – Therefore set aside order of High Court dismissing revision petition of appellants and remit the matter of the High Court to hear the revision petition on merits as early as possible - Petition allowed.

ORDER :- Petition for special leave to appeal against the decision of the High Court was granted. Ex parte ad interim stay of execution was granted subject to notice of motion being taken. The matter is listed to-day for confirmation of ex parte ad interim stay.

2. Mr. S. B. Bhasme, learned counsel for the respondents, fairly conceded that the High Court was in error in not examining the revision petition of the appellants on merits on the short ground that the appellants had failed to deposit the rent. This was an untenable ground and it was conceded by Mr. Bhasme. Revision petition once admitted has to be disposed of on merits. The High Court was in error in dismissing the revision petition on account of failure of the appellants to deposit some rent which had become due. Therefore, the order of the High Court dismissing the revision petition is liable to be set aside. It is no use of keeping the matter pending here. Therefore, we set aside the order of the High Court dismissing the revision petition of the appellants and remit the matter of the High Court to hear the revision petition on merits as early as possible. On account of the very fair attitude adopted by Mr. Bhasme, learned counsel for the respondents, we make no order as to costs.

Petition allowed.

For Citation : AIR 1983 SC 540

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top