SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
D.A. DESAI AND AMARENDRA NATH SEN, JJ.
Hukumchand Amolikchand Longde and others, Appellants
Versus
Madhava Balaji Potdar and another, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 788 of 1982, D/- 31-1-1983.
Advocates appeared
Mr. E. C. Agarwala, Advocate for Appellants; Mr. S. B. Bhasme, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S. S. Khanduji, Advocate for Respondents.
Civil Appeal - Ex parte ad interim stay - Execution of - Counsel for respondents, fairly conceded that High Court was in error in not examining revision petition of appellants on merits on short ground that appellants had failed to deposit the rent - Held, Order of High Court dismissing revision petition is liable to be set aside - It is no use of keeping matter pending here – Therefore set aside order of High Court dismissing revision petition of appellants and remit the matter of the High Court to hear the revision petition on merits as early as possible - Petition allowed.
ORDER :- Petition for special leave to appeal against the decision of the High Court was granted. Ex parte ad interim stay of execution was granted subject to notice of motion being taken. The matter is listed to-day for confirmation of ex parte ad interim stay.
2. Mr. S. B. Bhasme, learned counsel for the respondents, fairly conceded that the High Court was in error in not examining the revision petition of the appellants on merits on the short ground that the appellants had failed to deposit the rent. This was an untenable ground and it was conceded by Mr. Bhasme. Revision petition once admitted has to be disposed of on merits. The High Court was in error in dismissing the revision petition on account of failure of the appellants to deposit some rent which had become due. Therefore, the order of the High Court dismissing the revision petition is liable to be set aside. It is no use of keeping the matter pending here. Therefore, we set aside the order of the High Court dismissing the revision petition of the appellants and remit the matter of the High Court to hear the revision petition on merits as early as possible. On account of the very fair attitude adopted by Mr. Bhasme, learned counsel for the respondents, we make no order as to costs.
Petition allowed.
For Citation : AIR 1983 SC 540
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.