ORDER :- In the above matters since a dispute was raised as to whether the provisional admissions granted to the two petitioners had continued till 1st Oct. 1982 or were cancelled long prior to that date, an issue was sent to the District Judge Rohtak for inquiry and a finding thereon. The District Judge Rohtak was required to submit his report within a specified time. Later for some reasons, which it is unnecessary to mention, the enquiry was transferred to the District Judge, Hissar who has now submitted his report to this Court through his letter dated 4th February, 1983. After holding a fulfledged enquiry during the course of which oral as well as documentary evidence was produced by the parties in support of their respective versions, the District Judge has recorded a finding against the petitioners to the effect that to their knowledge their provisional admissions had been cancelled by the concerned authorities much before the crucial date namely, 1-10-1982. In other words, it is clear that on 1-10-1982 thepetitioners made a false representation to this Court that they were continuing their studies as post-graduate students of Medical College Rohtak on 1-10-1982, and obtained