SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(SC) 99

S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Roshan Lal Raina – Appellant
Versus
State Of J & K – Respondent


Advocates:
A.SUBASHINI, Altaf Ahmed, C.V.SUBBA RAO, N.C.TALUKDAR

Judgment

O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, J. :- Roshan Lal, tourist clerk in the Dak Bungalow, Banihal was tried by the learned First Class Magistrate, Ram Ban for offences under Ss. 409 and 420 R. P. C. and duly acquitted of the charges. On an appeal by the State of Jammu and Kashmir, he was convicted of an offence under Section 409, R. P. C. and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for a period of four months. The acquittal under Section 420, R. P. C. was maintained. Roshan Lal has appealed to this court, under Art. 136 of the Constitution.

2. The case against the appellant was that between October 15, 1965 and October 22, 1965, he collected a sum of Rupees 70.80 p. from various tourists, who stayed at the Dak Bungalow and misappropriated the same. We have been taken through the judgments of the learned First Class Magistrate and the High Court and the evidence of all the relevant witnesses. We are satisfied that the case against the appellant has not been established. Shri R. Duchen, Superintendent of Police at whose instance it was that the misappropriation of the amount was supposed to have been unearthed, stated in his evidence that he paid the rent of the room to the Chowkidar and made an entr


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top