SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(SC) 166

A.V.VARADARAJAN, M.P.THAKKAR, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Naginbhai Dhulabhai Patel – Respondent


Advocates:
R.N.Poddar, T.U.Mehta, VIMAL DAVE

Judgment

FAZAL ALI, J. :- This appeal by special leave is directed against a judgment of the Gujarat High Court by which the respondents had been acquitted of the charges framed against them and the conviction and sentences imposed on them were set aside.

2. The trial Court of the Additional Sessions Judge, Broach had convicted only A 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 13 (for facility, A indicates accused) and acquitted the other five accused who were placed for trial before the learned Judge. Apart from the convictions for individual offences, the aforesaid accused were convicted under S. 302 read with S. 149 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to imprisonment for life plus a fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of the payment of fine, rigorous imprisonment for six months. At this stage, it is not necessary to give any detail of the other convictions because after hearing counsel for the parties and going through the judgments of the Courts below we are satisfied that so far as the charge under S. 302/149, IPC is concerned it has been proved beyond reasonable doubt and the High Court was clearly wrong in reversing the acquittal of the aforesaid accused under these sections.

3. This is a c

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top