SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(SC) 117

A.P.SEN, R.S.PATHAK
Binoy Kumar Chatterjee – Appellant
Versus
Jugantar LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.SEN GUPTA, D.N.MUKHERJI, M.C.DHINGRA, M.K.RAMAMURTHY, N.R.CHAUDHARY, SANTOSH CHATTERJI, SANTOSH MUKHERJI

Judgment

PATHAK, J.:- The petitioner, Shri Binoy Kumar Chatterjee prays for special leave to appeal under Art. 136 of the Constitution against the award dated April 27, 1981 of the Second Labour Court, West Bengal.

2. The petitioner was appointed to the post of Sub-editor in the employment of M/s. Jugantar Limited in April 18, 1960. In the following month he was transferred to Delhi as a Special Correspondent. In August, 1976 he was transferred to Calcutta as an Assistant Editor. On completing 60 years of age he was served with a notice of retirement dated Nov. 6, 1976 informing him that he stood retired with effect from Dec. 1, 1976. He was paid and he willingly received his dues on account of gratuity and Provident Fund following such retirement. Thereafter, it seems that he was offered fresh employment as an Assistant Editor for a period of twelve months under a contract. He accepted the employment on that basis. On the expiry of the period of twelve months he raised a dispute alleging that his service had been wrongly terminated with effect from Dec. 1, 1976 and that he was entitled to continue in service.

3. The Government of West Bengal referred the dispute to the Second Labour










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top